The United States hit three Iranian nuclear sites with massive bombs over the weekend. Former Secretary of State Antony Blinken criticized the move as reckless—but admitted he hopes it did the job.
Key Facts:
- President Trump authorized strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites Saturday using 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs.
- Trump called it “a spectacular military success” and announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran soon after.
- Antony Blinken condemned the strike in a New York Times essay, saying it was “unwise and unnecessary.”
- Blinken blamed Trump for escalating tensions by ending Obama’s 2015 Iran nuclear deal in 2018.
- Trump defended the strikes, blasted CNN’s coverage, and demanded an apology to B-2 bomber pilots.
The Rest of The Story:
Blinken’s essay criticized the decision to strike Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, arguing that Trump “jumped the gun” and failed to exhaust diplomatic options.
He pointed out that U.S. intelligence did not believe Iran had made a decision to build a nuclear weapon and suggested it would still take Tehran up to two years to make one if it did.
He questioned the effectiveness of the strike, especially the ability of the Massive Ordnance Penetrators to disable deeply buried nuclear sites like Fordo.
Still, Blinken said he hopes the attack gives Trump the leverage needed to secure a real deal.
Trump fired back at critics, claiming CNN was “trying to say” the attack wasn’t effective and called for the network to apologize to the pilots who carried out the mission.
He maintained that the strike “demolished” the targets.
Some thoughts on the strikes against Iran’s nuclear program: https://t.co/x9JKh6Dqnf
— Antony Blinken (@ABlinken) June 24, 2025
Commentary:
This is rich. Antony Blinken, architect of the disastrous Obama-era Iran deal, is now second-guessing Trump’s playbook while quietly rooting for its success.
That’s like the arsonist criticizing the fireman’s hose pressure—after lighting the match.
Let’s get real. The 2015 deal gave Iran a payday and a glide path to nukes with a timer. Trump shredded it.
And when Iran started testing his resolve, he dropped a reminder from 40,000 feet.
Blinken laments the “lost chance” for diplomacy. But what kind of diplomacy was left?
The mullahs didn’t fear Obama or Biden, and they didn’t respect Blinken or his negotiators.
Trump sent a message they couldn’t miss—and didn’t need to translate.
The pearl-clutchers in the press are asking if the bombs worked.But Iran’s tone shifted, and a ceasefire followed.
That’s not coincidence—it’s cause and effect. Peace through strength isn’t just a slogan. It’s deterrence with teeth.
As for the media? Their reflex is to doubt anything that doesn’t align with their narrative.
Trump could flatten a terrorist bunker, and they’d run infrared scans looking for “survivors.”
And here’s the kicker: Blinken admits he hopes the mission succeeded.
Why? Because even he knows failure now means Iran gets a second wind—and nukes aren’t something you negotiate away with hashtags.
For all the hand-wringing, this was classic Trump. Direct. Decisive. And designed to reset the board before Tehran flips it over.
The Bottom Line:
Blinken may not like how Trump played his cards, but even he’s praying the gamble pays off.
The alternative? A nuclear Iran emboldened by American hesitation. Trump didn’t wait to find out. And we should be gald.
Read Next
RJK Jr. and Dr. Oz Announce Big Win for Patients: Insurance Industry Agrees to Drastic Reforms
Freedom Wins: Short-Barrel Guns Now Legal Under Texas Law
US Government Releases Video of ‘Disc-Shaped’ UFO With Abnormal Heat Signature
Trump’s Profanity-Laced Warning Halts Israeli Assault After Iranian Broke the Ceasefire
Court Backs AI’s Right to Use Stolen Books for Training—Trial on Piracy Still Looms
