The Department of Justice is suing Minnesota for offering in-state tuition and free college to illegal immigrants—benefits not available to out-of-state American citizens. The move follows similar action in Texas and stems from two executive orders signed by President Trump after returning to office.
Key Facts:
- The DOJ filed a complaint challenging Minnesota laws that offer free and reduced in-state tuition to illegal immigrants.
- Federal law bars states from providing education benefits to illegal immigrants that are not equally available to U.S. citizens.
- Attorney General Pam Bondi said no state can treat Americans like “second-class citizens” while rewarding illegal immigration.
- Trump’s executive orders direct agencies to block taxpayer-funded benefits for unqualified aliens and stop states from giving tuition breaks to non-citizens.
- Texas stopped enforcing its Dream Act after DOJ pressure; groups like the ACLU are now suing to defend it.
The Rest of The Story:
The DOJ argues that Minnesota’s laws violate federal immigration policy by rewarding those in the country illegally while excluding U.S. citizens from the same benefits.
The department wants the state to stop offering in-state tuition and free college to illegal immigrants who meet state residency and income thresholds.
This action is part of a broader federal campaign under Trump’s revived presidency to enforce stricter immigration rules.
The DOJ previously succeeded in pressuring Texas to halt its Dream Act, a 2001 law allowing illegal immigrants to pay in-state rates if they graduated from Texas high schools and met basic criteria.
Now, civil rights groups like the ACLU are stepping in.
They claim Texas caved to the DOJ without due process and that ending tuition benefits “threatens students’ dreams of pursuing higher education.”
Commentary:
This case is about more than just tuition—it’s about fairness, sovereignty, and the role of state governments in immigration policy.
Minnesota’s decision to hand out tuition perks to illegal immigrants while denying them to American citizens from other states doesn’t just bend the rules—it breaks them.
Federal law is clear: benefits reserved for citizens can’t be funneled to those who broke the law to get here.
The Trump administration’s executive orders are drawing a line in the sand. No more subsidizing open borders with taxpayer cash.
No more rewarding unlawful presence with special treatment. And no more state-level sanctuary policies dressed up as “education reform.”
Let’s be honest: when a citizen from Wisconsin pays more than someone in Minnesota who isn’t even here legally, that’s not compassion—it’s betrayal.
It tells law-abiding Americans their status means less than a bureaucrat’s political agenda.
The incentives here are upside down.
These tuition laws encourage illegal residency and undercut the value of citizenship.
They also shift costs onto taxpayers already footing the bill for overwhelmed schools, strained welfare programs, and rising crime tied to border chaos.
Supporters of these policies speak of “dreams” and “equality.”
But what about the dream of a Kansas farm kid who wants to attend college but can’t afford out-of-state tuition in Minnesota? Where’s his advocacy group?
States like Minnesota are inviting a showdown by ignoring the supremacy of federal law.
They’re gambling with public funds, federal compliance, and long-term social cohesion—all to score points with progressive activists.
The Bottom Line:
The DOJ’s lawsuit against Minnesota marks a broader federal push to restore immigration enforcement and equal treatment under the law.
States can’t play favorites with taxpayer money—and they certainly can’t elevate illegal immigrants above U.S. citizens.
The courts will now decide whether federal law still means what it says.
Read Next
– UN Watchdog Destroys Dem Narrative Regarding Strike on Iran’s Nuclear Program
– Biden Appointed Federal Judge Orders Trump Admin to Release EV Funds to Blue States
