Trump Admin Says No To The World Health Organization’s Treaty on Pandemic Responses

By /

The United States has officially rejected the World Health Organization’s new pandemic response rules. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Marco Rubio say the measures threaten U.S. freedom, privacy, and national sovereignty.

Key Facts:

  • The U.S. rejected the WHO’s proposed amendments to international health regulations on July 19, 2024.
  • Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a joint statement opposing the measures.
  • Kennedy warned the amendments could lead to surveillance, censorship, and loss of U.S. sovereignty.
  • Rubio criticized the amendments’ vague language and emphasized an America First response to health emergencies.
  • The WHO proposals aimed to secure funding and medical supplies from member nations under the goal of “equity.”

The Rest of The Story:

The Biden-era commitment to international health cooperation took a major hit as the U.S. formally declined the World Health Organization’s (WHO) new pandemic framework.

The proposed measures, agreed to globally in June 2024, would have become binding unless rejected by July 19.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Secretary of Health and Human Services, stated that the proposed WHO amendments “open the door to the kind of narrative management, propaganda, and censorship that we saw during the COVID pandemic.”

He emphasized that the U.S. must not “cede away America’s treasured sovereignty.”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed those concerns, citing the “vague and broad” language throughout the proposals.

He warned the new rules could lead to international pressure based on political themes instead of science and said, “We will put Americans first in all our actions.”

The WHO’s amendments sought funding and product contributions from member states to serve developing nations under the goal of equitable access to emergency health tools.

The U.S. pushback ends that discussion—for now.

Commentary:

Kennedy and Rubio made the right call.

The World Health Organization utterly failed during COVID, pushing questionable science, promoting censorship, and showing deference to China’s early cover-ups.

Letting that same body gain more control would have been reckless.

During COVID, dissenting scientists and doctors were silenced, and entire populations were subjected to flawed lockdowns, mandates, and mass vaccination campaigns that didn’t live up to the promises.

Trust in public health took a massive hit—and rightly so.

The WHO wants to take the same broken approach global. Their demand for “equity” sounds noble but often translates into redistribution of resources without regard for real-time effectiveness or science-based strategies.

The language of the WHO’s proposal—terms like “solidarity” and “collective response”—hides the danger of bureaucratic overreach.

It could easily be used to pressure nations into groupthink and conformity under the banner of unity, even if that unity means suppressing the truth.

Thankfully, the Trump administration has already taken steps to protect the U.S. from such traps.

On his first day back in office, President Trump reasserted America’s independence by confirming plans to withdraw from the WHO, holding the organization accountable for its COVID-era failures.

With that groundwork laid, Kennedy and Rubio’s leadership signals that the U.S. is not going to repeat the same mistakes.

America must chart its own health path, rooted in transparency, sound science, and constitutional protections.

The days of outsourcing decision-making to global organizations that failed us once are over.

National sovereignty and citizens’ rights come first—especially when the stakes are life, liberty, and health.

The Bottom Line:

The U.S. has rejected new global health regulations pushed by the WHO, citing threats to freedom and flawed past performance.

With Kennedy and Rubio leading the charge, the government is putting civil liberties, science, and sovereignty ahead of international agendas.

This decision marks a firm end to the WHO’s pandemic-era influence over American policy and a renewed commitment to self-governance during health crises.

\

Sign Up For The TFPP Wire Newsletter

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You may opt out at any time.

Read Next

Trump Weighs Terror Designation Over Violent Anti-ICE Protests

Despite Epstein Uproar New Poll Shows Trump Support Has RISEN Among Republicans

Fed Chairman Powell Says He Won’t Resign Or Be Pressured Into Action Under Any Circumstances

President Trump Cancels ALL Federal Funding For California’s Boondoggle ‘Bullet Train to Nowhere’

Biden-Era Loophole on Indirect Abortion Funding for Unaccompanied Minors Closed by Trump Team

Read Next