After Appeals Court Win Trump Admin Begins Stripping Collective Bargaining Rights From Federal Workers

The Trump administration has begun cutting union protections for federal workers at the Department of Veterans Affairs, reversing course from previous legal assurances and impacting hundreds of thousands of employees. The decision is being framed as a push for accountability, while critics argue it’s retaliatory.

Key Facts:

  • The Department of Veterans Affairs announced it is ending collective bargaining rights for over 400,000 workers, most of whom are in the AFGE union.
  • This follows a federal appeals court ruling allowing Trump’s order to proceed, though the administration had previously promised to wait for the legal process to conclude.
  • VA Secretary Doug Collins accused unions of defending bad workers and opposing reforms to help veterans.
  • Union president Everett Kelley called the move retaliation and said it ripped up the existing contract unilaterally.
  • The move eliminates rights like arbitration, official time for union duties, and other key protections laid out in a 308-page agreement.

The Rest of The Story:

The Department of Veterans Affairs has taken action to eliminate collective bargaining agreements with its workforce, impacting over 400,000 federal employees. These workers were primarily represented by the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the largest union for federal workers. The VA’s move was presented as necessary to fix what it views as a culture of inefficiency and protectionism within the system.

VA Secretary Doug Collins issued a strong statement condemning union practices. “The unions that represent V.A. employees fight against the best interests of veterans while protecting and rewarding bad workers,” he said. The department’s decision essentially overrides a 308-page labor agreement that included protections like third-party arbitration and paid time for union duties.

The announcement came just days after a federal appeals court gave the Trump administration the green light to implement its 2018 executive order targeting union rights in federal agencies. However, that court decision hinged in part on the administration’s claim that no changes would occur until litigation was resolved — a claim now contradicted by this sudden action.

Union leaders and legal representatives were caught off guard. Attorney Eric L. Pines, who represents multiple VA union branches, was actively working on arbitration cases when the announcement hit. “That’s how shocking this is,” he said. The agency, he noted, was still operating as if arbitration processes were ongoing.

Unions say this is part of a broader attempt to dismantle organized labor within federal agencies under the guise of national security. Agencies without any national security role — like the EPA or HHS — are also affected, leading union representatives to claim that national security is just a pretext for breaking unions that oppose Trump-era policies.

Commentary:

This move by the Trump administration is long overdue. Federal employee unions have too often operated as untouchable political machines, not as partners in serving the public. Their primary concern seems to be protecting their members from accountability, not ensuring quality service for veterans or taxpayers.

Unionizing government workers was always a flawed concept. In the private sector, unions negotiate for a share of profits generated by businesses. But in government, there are no profits—only taxpayer money. Allowing public employees to unionize effectively creates a lobbying arm inside the government demanding more from the very citizens they’re supposed to serve.

The notion that VA employees should have more protection and perks than many private-sector workers is unjust. Government employment already comes with unmatched job security. Adding union protections that block the removal of underperforming or problematic workers is a recipe for dysfunction.

Taxpayers should not be expected to fund endless arbitration and cushy union benefits while many of them struggle with fewer rights and resources in their own jobs. The federal government must operate efficiently, and that means it must be able to hold employees accountable.

Ending these union protections helps restore balance. It sends a message that government service is a duty, not a guaranteed entitlement. When VA workers are shielded from accountability, it’s the veterans who ultimately suffer.

The Trump administration’s approach puts veterans and taxpayers first. It may ruffle feathers within the bureaucracy, but that’s often necessary when trying to clean up entrenched inefficiency.

Critics calling this retaliation miss the bigger point. If the unions hadn’t become so political and oppositional, they might still have a role to play. But as it stands, they’ve been more about obstruction than service.

Federal unions should not have the power to paralyze government functions, and this is a step toward restoring responsibility in the federal workforce.

The Bottom Line:

The Trump administration has followed through on its promise to reform the federal workforce by ending union protections for VA employees. This controversial move underscores a larger effort to reduce bureaucracy and prioritize accountability. Whether viewed as necessary reform or political retaliation, the change is already reshaping the relationship between government workers and the agencies they serve.

Sign Up For The TFPP Wire Newsletter

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You may opt out at any time.

Read Next

Trump Administration Takes Huge Step to Protect Women’s Sports Ahead of 2028 Olympics

Texas Gov. Abbott Threatens To Remove Dem Lawmakers Who Fled the State From Office

GOP Takes Aim at Letitia James and Adams Schiff with Bill to Crack Down on Financial Crimes in Public Office