San Francisco has been declared the “worst run” city in the United States according to a recent report by WalletHub.
The study, which evaluated the effectiveness of local leadership in the 148 largest cities nationwide, placed San Francisco at the bottom of the list due to its poor fiscal management and exorbitant long-term debt.
The report’s methodology compared the quality of city services against each city’s total budget to determine its operating efficiency.
Cities were ranked using a “Quality of Services” score, which consisted of 36 metrics across six service categories.
Despite San Francisco ranking 24th in quality of services, it placed dead last in its total budget per-capita rank and carried the highest amount of long-term debt outstanding.
In response to the report, Parisa Safarzadeh, a spokesperson for the San Francisco Mayor’s Office, dismissed the findings as “misleading and inaccurate.”
These are not words that San Francisco Mayor London Breed wants to hear: The City is the worst-run in the United States. https://t.co/1Tvbk03tQo
— KTVU (@KTVU) June 18, 2024
Safarzadeh argued that the study unfairly compares San Francisco’s combined city and county budget with other cities that only have city budgets.
However, WalletHub communications manager Diana Polk maintained that the report relies on the Fiscally Standardized Cities (FiSC) database to ensure an unbiased, apples-to-apples comparison between municipalities.
This is not the first time San Francisco has been criticized for its financial mismanagement.
In 2023, WalletHub also dubbed the city the “worst run” in the nation, and in 2022, it ranked second-to-last.
The persistent poor rankings highlight the city’s ongoing struggle to effectively manage its resources and address its mounting debt.
In stark contrast, Nampa, Idaho, has been named the “best run” city for the eighth consecutive year.
Mayor Debbie King attributes the city’s success to the wise use of taxpayer dollars and a strong sense of stewardship. “We’re always mindful of how we best utilize the tax dollars that we’ve been entrusted with,” King explained in an interview with Fox News Digital.
The glaring difference between San Francisco and Nampa illustrates the importance of fiscal responsibility and effective leadership at the local level.
Another Asian female elder attacked by young racist thug in the San Francisco Bay Area! No outrage, no protests, no town hall meetings, minimal punishments. These attacks are attempted murder. pic.twitter.com/GOXlZuRHaX
— Asian Crime Report (@activeasian) July 27, 2023
While San Francisco struggles with the consequences of decades of financial mismanagement, Nampa serves as a model for other cities, demonstrating that prudent spending and a commitment to serving citizens’ needs can lead to long-term success.
It is worth noting that San Francisco has not had a Republican mayor since 1964, with the city being dominated by Democratic leadership for nearly six decades.
READ NEXT: Report: Country on the Verge of a Corporate Bankruptcy Wave, Could Result in Massive Job Losses
The correlation between the city’s fiscal woes and its one-party rule raises questions about the effectiveness of unchallenged political ideologies in addressing complex urban challenges.
