California Democrats Vote to Keep Biological Male Sex Offenders in Female Prisons

Democrats in California have blocked a bill aimed at protecting incarcerated women from male sex offenders being housed in their prisons. The decision leaves women vulnerable under a law that prioritizes gender identity over biological sex.**

Key Facts:

  • The California Senate Public Safety Committee rejected a bill by Republican Senator Shannon Grove that would have banned male sex offenders from women’s prisons.
  • The bill sought to amend SB 132, a law allowing inmates to be housed based on their gender identity.
  • Grove’s proposal had support from women’s rights advocates and former inmates, but only one vote—Republican Senator Kelly Seyarto—on the committee.
  • Democrat Senator Scott Wiener defended SB 132, calling Grove’s bill discriminatory and part of a “culture war.”
  • Nearly 34% of male inmates identifying as women and seeking transfer into female facilities are registered sex offenders.

The Rest of The Story:

Senator Shannon Grove introduced the bill after hearing from female inmates who said they were forced to live with violent men identifying as women.

One inmate sent her a condom given out by staff, raising questions about prison policies.

Another testified about being beaten so badly by a male inmate that she lost her unborn child.

SB 132, passed under Democrat leadership, allows inmates to self-identify their gender, leading to the transfer of dozens of male offenders into female prisons.

Of the nearly 900 male requests for transfer, many involve those with serious sex crime convictions.

There have been 45 males who identify as transgender that have been transferred into female prisons since implementation of SB132.

Despite these risks, Grove’s bill was shot down along party lines.

Those backing the bill included former female inmates, parents’ rights advocates, and women’s safety groups.

They argued it was common sense to at least keep known sex offenders out of women’s spaces, but Democrats insisted that enforcing such a rule would be discriminatory.

Commentary:

This story isn’t about identity—it’s about safety.

The idea that biological men, especially those convicted of sexual crimes, should be allowed in women’s prisons defies reason and decency.

No amount of gender theory changes the reality that these are male offenders—some guilty of rape and child molestation—being placed in close quarters with vulnerable women.

It’s a violation of basic human rights to ignore that danger in favor of political correctness.

Women in prison can’t simply walk away.

They are forced to share showers, beds, and bathrooms with people who, by every biological and legal standard, are men.

And not just any men—violent men with sex crime convictions.

The fact that California Democrats refused even to support a modest safeguard shows just how radical their priorities have become.

They’re not protecting women. They’re appeasing activists. And they’re doing so at the cost of real trauma and abuse.

If this were happening in any other setting—say, a women’s shelter or a high school locker room—it would be a national scandal.

But inside a prison, where women have no voice and no escape, it’s somehow acceptable.

This isn’t about hate or fear—it’s about refusing to ignore facts.

When nearly 60% of male inmates requesting transfer have committed sex crimes, that’s not a fluke.

It’s a loophole being abused.

Until this policy changes, California’s most vulnerable women are paying the price for lawmakers’ obsession with ideology over accountability.

The Bottom Line:

California Democrats blocked a bill that would have removed male sex offenders from women’s prisons.

Instead of protecting female inmates, the state continues to enforce a radical policy that ignores biology and endangers lives.

Women deserve better—even if they’re behind bars.

Real justice means putting safety before slogans. Shouldn’t that be the bare minimum?

Sign Up For The TFPP Wire Newsletter

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You may opt out at any time.

Read Next

Democrat Congressman Introduces Seven Articles of Impeachment Against Trump

RFK Scores Major MAHA Victory, PepsiCo Rushes to Make Big Changes to its Products

Purse Thief Explains Why He Stole DHS Secretary Kristi Noem’s Hand Bag

DC Mayor Bowser Caught With Her Hands In The Cookie Jar, She Has Some Explaining To Do

DOJ’s Civil Rights Division Attorneys Resign En Masse Rather Than Enforce Trump Priorities