China May Gain Greater Control Over Panama Canal After Blackrock Deal Collapses

China may soon gain greater influence over the Panama Canal following the collapse of a proposed deal between U.S.-based BlackRock and Hong Kong’s CK Hutchison, which had initially sparked tensions with Beijing.

Key Facts:

  • A proposed deal between BlackRock and CK Hutchison to control 43 global ports has collapsed.
  • The ports included two key terminals in Panama—Balboa and Cristobal—located at each end of the Panama Canal.
  • China pressured for state-owned Cosco to be part of the deal, raising concerns about Beijing’s growing influence.
  • CK Hutchison is now considering a restructured deal that includes a “major strategic investor” from mainland China.
  • President Donald Trump has suggested the U.S. should reclaim the Panama Canal.

The Rest of The Story:

A high-profile deal to transfer control of dozens of global ports—including two vital to the Panama Canal—has collapsed under pressure from Beijing.

The $23 billion agreement between U.S. asset manager BlackRock and CK Hutchison, a Hong Kong-based firm, fell through after China demanded that state-owned shipping giant Cosco be directly involved.

CK Hutchison, controlled by the family of Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing, has managed the Panamanian ports since 1997.

The firm confirmed that its exclusive negotiation window with BlackRock expired but left the door open to new partners.

Specifically, it signaled interest in inviting a strategic investor from the People’s Republic of China.

The ports in question—Balboa and Cristobal—serve as bookends to the Panama Canal, one of the world’s most vital shipping arteries.

While Panama insists it retains full sovereignty over the canal, critics worry about how much control a Chinese state-backed firm could exercise through surrounding infrastructure.

China’s involvement in Latin American infrastructure is nothing new.

But Trump is the only modern U.S. president to say the canal should be taken back.

“We didn’t give it to China—we gave it to Panama—and we’re taking it back,” he said recently.

Analyst Dane Chamorro warned the broader impact may be worse: “In the long run, that may result in even more ports globally ending up in the hands of a Chinese state-owned entity.”

Commentary:

This failed deal is not just a missed business opportunity—it’s a national security red flag.

China’s grip on global ports is growing, and with Cosco in play, Beijing’s control could soon become dominant worldwide.

That’s a direct challenge to American influence, particularly in the Western Hemisphere.

The Panama Canal isn’t just another shipping lane—it’s a choke point for international trade and a strategic military passage.

China’s push to control both ends of it through Cosco isn’t just about profits; it’s about power.

The notion that Panama holds “full sovereignty” means little if a foreign government holds operational control just outside the gates.

The Trump administration understood what was at stake.

His call to “take it back” might have sounded extreme to some, but the warning was clear: allowing Chinese state-owned companies to surround one of the world’s most strategic assets is a geopolitical mistake.

Instead of walking away after the BlackRock deal collapsed, the U.S. should double down.

The treaty giving the canal to Panama does not mean America has to stand by while an adversary gains indirect control.

Economic and diplomatic pressure must be applied to block any deal involving Cosco or other Chinese entities.

Panama relies on U.S. financial and political support. It’s time to use that leverage.

Trump’s administration could tie foreign aid, trade, and infrastructure investment to Panama distancing itself from Chinese partners.

And it’s not just about Panama. The U.S. must start building global port partnerships of its own.

China’s edge in port dominance stems from long-term planning, something the U.S. has lacked in this space for decades.

America cannot afford to lose more ground in critical supply chain infrastructure.

Letting China walk away with global port control—especially at the Panama Canal—would be a serious strategic blunder.

The Bottom Line:

A major U.S.-backed deal to reduce Chinese control of Panama Canal ports has collapsed, giving Beijing a fresh opening.

Unless the U.S. acts decisively, China may soon strengthen its influence over one of the world’s most important shipping lanes.

The Trump administration’s calls for action should now become policy, not just rhetoric.

Sign Up For The TFPP Wire Newsletter

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You may opt out at any time.

Read Next

Trump and EU Seal Surprise Deal After Last-Minute Talks

Trump Slams Kamala, Celebs Over Alleged Pay-For-Play Endorsements, ‘They Should All Be Prosecuted’

New Poll Shows Democrat Favorability Hits 35 Year Low, GOP Gains on Key Issues