James Carville, a longtime Democratic strategist, gave a blunt assessment of Democrats’ decision to run Kamala Harris for president in 2024. He likened it to starting a “7th string quarterback” in the Super Bowl, suggesting the party’s top talent stayed on the sidelines.
Key Facts:
- Carville made the comments on PBS’ “Firing Line,” saying Democrats put forward an unprepared candidate.
- He felt the party had stronger voices who could “actually complete a sentence.”
- In a New York Times column, he wrote, “Three Reasons I’m Certain Kamala Harris Will Win,” despite harboring concerns internally.
- During the 2024 campaign, Harris drew criticism for her unscripted statements and “word salad” responses.
- Carville criticized fellow Democrats for doubting Harris too openly, calling them “sweaty Democratic operatives.”
The Rest of The Story:
Carville argued that Democrats had numerous politicians who could have brought much more clarity and experience to the 2024 election.
Yet the party chose Harris, who had served as vice president under Joe Biden until she took up her own candidacy.
During the race, her public speaking style and perceived lack of clear messaging drew repeated questions about her readiness.
Looking back, Carville appears frustrated that the Democratic primary process did not showcase the best the party had to offer.
He cited potential contenders who might have united voters with proven legislative achievements and more polished communication skills.
In his view, Democrats paid the price by allowing President Donald Trump to reclaim the White House, further deepening the party’s internal divide.
James Carville takes Kamala Harris to the woodshed by calling her a '7th string quarterback' that couldn't put together a sentence:
James Carville: "We ran a presidential election, if we were playing a superbowl, we started our 7th string quarterback. You can't address a problem… pic.twitter.com/RBUXKNJSMa— Eric Abbenante (@EricAbbenante) February 1, 2025
Commentary:
Carville’s frank perspective on the 2024 Democratic nominee resonates with many people who watched that election unfold.
Her uncertain debate performances and uneven campaign messaging left many voters feeling uneasy.
A presidential candidate must be able to connect with audiences, earn trust, and present tangible ideas.
Harris’s repeated missteps showed a lack of ability for the toughest job in the world.
In contrast, Donald Trump’s commanding style and direct approach appealed more strongly to the public.
Judging by the election results, a lot of Americans concluded that Harris did not have the necessary leadership qualities.
Even Carville, a staunch Democrat, acknowledged the party’s error in choosing a “7th string quarterback.”
A candidate must have a clear vision and possess world class communication skills if they hope to win the White House.
The Bottom Line:
James Carville’s candid remarks showcase the internal Democratic Party debate on whether they put forth their best candidate in 2024.
Many in the party question the strategy of relying on Harris, given her uncertain campaign style.
Carville’s shift in tone illustrates the difficulties Democrats face in rebuilding trust and energizing voters for the next round.
Whether they can reorganize and come back stronger remains to be seen.
Given what we’ve seen so far it seems the answer is no, but time will tell.
Read Next
– Maye Musk Wants Elon to Sue the Media For Defamation And We Hope He Does, Here’s Why…
– Dangerous Mexican Cartel Members Caught in Massive Train Heist in Arizona