In the wake of Donald Trump’s recent conviction for allegedly offering hush money to influence the 2016 election, a similar accusation against former President Barack Obama has resurfaced.
According to a 2012 report by Edward Klein in the New York Post, Obama may have offered $150,000 to his former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, to keep quiet during the 2008 presidential campaign.
Reverend Wright’s controversial and anti-American statements had become a major problem for Obama’s presidential run.
In an interview with Klein, Wright claimed that he received an email from one of Obama’s closest friends, offering him money to stay silent until after the November election. “Man, the media ate me alive,” Wright said, describing the aftermath of his controversial remarks. “After the media went ballistic on me, I received an e-mail offering me money not to preach at all until the November presidential election.”
Wright revealed that the email was sent to a member of his church, who then passed it on to him.
The alleged sum offered was a significant $150,000. But the story doesn’t end there. Wright also claimed that Obama himself wanted to meet secretly to discuss the matter, insisting on a secure location.
“Barack said he wanted to meet me in secret, in a secure place,” Wright recalled. “And I said, ‘You’re used to coming to my home, you’ve been here countless times, so what’s wrong with coming to my home?'”
The alleged meeting took place in the living room of the parsonage of Trinity United Church of Christ, with only Obama and Wright present.
Hey, @ManhattanDA: Here's another hush money felony for you to indict and convict someone on. Get after @BarackObama, you fat worthless Nazi pig. – Flashback: Barack Obama Offered Jeremiah Wright Hush Money During 2008 Campaign https://t.co/mI9BD3DbV6
— Rex_Tudor_Coup (@iamgnurr) June 3, 2024
During this meeting, Wright stated that Obama asked him to refrain from public speaking until after the election, saying, “I really wish you wouldn’t do any more public speaking until after the November election. It’s gonna hurt the campaign if you do that.”
These allegations, which came to light during Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign, didn’t gain much attention outside of conservative media and blogs.
The legal experts who strongly believe that Trump committed a serious crime by allegedly offering hush money were largely silent about the accusations against Obama.
The difference in how these two cases were handled raises serious questions about fairness in the American justice system.
If the allegations against Obama are true, and he did try to silence Wright with a large sum of money through a close friend who might have been a campaign donor, then why wasn’t Obama investigated and punished like Trump?
As the country deals with the fallout from Trump’s conviction, it’s important to look at the apparent double standard in how the law is applied.
If offering hush money to influence an election is a crime, then it should be treated as a crime no matter who the accused is or what political party they belong to.
If Obama’s alleged actions aren’t investigated and prosecuted, it would only reinforce the idea that there are two different justice systems – one for the powerful and another for everyone else.
To maintain trust in the American legal system, these allegations must be thoroughly investigated and addressed.
If the evidence supports Reverend Wright’s claims, then Obama should face the same consequences as Trump.
READ NEXT: Key Parts of the US Economy Are Slowing All at The Same Time: Report
On the other hand, if the allegations turn out to be untrue, it’s equally important to clear up the matter and restore public confidence in the fair application of justice.
