Denmark and eight other European countries are pushing back against the European Court of Human Rights, saying its rulings make it too difficult to deport immigrants who commit crimes. The leaders say their citizens’ safety is at risk, and they want more control.
Key Facts:
- Denmark and eight other nations—Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Italy, and Poland—signed a letter urging changes to deportation policy.
- The letter criticizes the European Court of Human Rights for blocking deportations of criminal immigrants.
- Denmark is set to assume the EU presidency in July and is leading this push for reform.
- The letter asks for more freedom to deport immigrants involved in violent or drug-related crimes and better tracking of illegal migrants.
- The move comes shortly after British PM Keir Starmer proposed tougher immigration rules in the UK.
The Rest of The Story:
The nine European nations argue that current human rights interpretations are weakening their authority to protect public safety.
They acknowledge that many immigrants integrate well, but others form “parallel societies” and commit serious crimes.
These leaders are frustrated that rulings from the European Court often prevent deportation even in clear criminal cases.
The letter expresses concern that the court’s actions undermine national sovereignty and democratic decision-making.
It calls for a system that allows European countries to deal more effectively with criminal migrants and secure their borders against exploitation by hostile foreign actors.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s recent speech echoes similar concerns.
He promised strict immigration controls and a system that favors domestic training over foreign labor.
His government aims to sharply reduce legal immigration in response to growing voter frustration.
🇮🇹 Giorgia Meloni:
"Europe wants to deport migrants who have failed to integrate, but the ECHR is stopping us. This is unacceptable!" pic.twitter.com/J1KoT86w60
— Update NEWS (@UpdateNews724) May 25, 2025
Commentary:
The leaders of these nine countries are right to raise alarm.
A nation that cannot deport foreign criminals risks becoming a sanctuary for those who abuse its freedoms.
At its core, this is a question of sovereignty and the duty of governments to protect their citizens.
The European Court of Human Rights was designed to protect individuals from abuse—not shield those who break the law from accountability.
When that mission gets twisted, it begins to undermine trust in the entire system.
What’s troubling is how long these countries tolerated these limitations.
For years, many of them welcomed waves of migrants, often under EU pressure, and handed over authority to distant Brussels-based institutions.
The loss of national control was predictable.
Now the consequences are clear.
Crime rates rise, neighborhoods change, and local populations feel ignored.
These leaders are trying to reclaim powers they should never have given up in the first place.
It’s worth asking whether staying in the European Union serves these countries anymore.
As long as the EU and its court system block deportations, no country can fully secure its borders or enforce its laws.
The solution may require more than a sternly worded letter.
A coordinated push for legal reform or even EU exit talks could be the next logical step.
This letter is a first step, but the real question is whether these countries are willing to follow through.
Will they put their citizens first—or cave once again to elite international pressure?
The public is watching.
And if the political class fails to act, populist movements likely will.
The Bottom Line:
Nine European nations are demanding the right to deport criminal migrants without interference from the European Court of Human Rights.
They argue that public safety and democratic authority are being undermined.
This growing tension between national control and EU authority could force broader changes—or even lead some nations to reconsider their place in the European Union altogether.
Read Next
– LA City Council Approves $30 Minimum Wage For Hotel Workers, Gets Hit With Immediate Consequences
– RFK Jr’s Highly Anticipated MAHA Report Drops And What They Found Is Even Worse Than We Expected
– Proposed New Law Would Block Foreign Adversaries Trying to Buy US Real Estate
– Tariffs Trigger Reshoring Boom: 90% of U.S. Companies Shifting Production Back Home
– Jill Biden Accused of Elder Abuse By Washington Post Columnist
