A federal judge has halted the Trump administration’s directive to stop taxpayer-funded gender transition treatments for federal inmates. The ruling sides with transgender prisoners seeking continued access to controversial medical procedures.
Key Facts:
- Judge Royce Lamberth issued an injunction against Trump’s executive order restricting gender transition care in federal prisons.
- The order had directed the Bureau of Prisons to stop funding treatments or procedures meant to alter an inmate’s appearance to that of the opposite sex.
- The ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by three transgender inmates diagnosed with gender dysphoria.
- Lamberth argued that the Trump administration failed to justify treating gender dysphoria differently from other mental health conditions.
- Before the executive order, the BOP had begun funding gender surgeries, including for convicted bank robber and former white supremacist Donna Langan.
The Rest of The Story:
In a 36-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, a Reagan appointee, ruled against the Trump administration’s executive order halting federal support for gender transition procedures in prisons.
The decision followed a lawsuit brought by three transgender inmates, who argued that the abrupt policy shift violated the Administrative Procedure Act.
Lamberth emphasized that neither the Bureau of Prisons nor the executive order offered a valid reason for singling out gender dysphoria for different treatment.
He stated the agency could not “arbitrarily deprive inmates of medications or other lifestyle accommodations” that prison medical staff had deemed appropriate.
The White House responded by reinforcing its stance that placing biological men in female prisons is unsafe and denies basic biological facts.
This ruling effectively reinstates BOP policies that had begun under the previous administration in 2022, including taxpayer-funded gender surgeries.
Among the first to receive such treatment was Donna Langan, a convicted white supremacist and bank robber, who transitioned while serving a federal sentence.
🚨 OUTRAGEOUS: Judge Royce Lamberth, a federal judge just ruled AGAINST Trump’s order halting sex change procedures in federal prisons.
The court sided with convicted criminals over common sense—blocking the Bureau of Prisons from stopping taxpayer-funded gender dysphoria… pic.twitter.com/idSD3GsRAF
— Rafael Santiago (@RaphySantiag) June 3, 2025
Commentary:
Once again, a federal judge has used his bench to override an executive decision made by a duly elected president.
While Judge Lamberth claims the administration didn’t provide a detailed explanation, it’s clear the executive order was grounded in protecting biological reality and public safety within the prison system.
Treatments for gender dysphoria, including hormone therapy and surgery, remain highly controversial.
There are no long-term studies proving these methods improve mental health outcomes.
In fact, evidence shows many individuals later regret transitioning and suffer long-term medical complications.
The idea that prisons must offer these irreversible procedures raises serious questions—especially when taxpayers are expected to foot the bill.
Moreover, allowing convicted men to claim a new gender identity after sentencing opens the door to abuse of the system.
It creates safety risks for female inmates and further erodes the already fragile public trust in our criminal justice institutions.
Should a man convicted of violent crimes really have the right to switch prisons on a whim based on self-identification?
This ruling, like others before it, reflects a growing trend in the judiciary to substitute political preference for legal principle.
Courts are increasingly resistant to common-sense policies simply because they come from Trump’s desk.
This is judicial activism cloaked in procedural jargon, and it’s dangerous.
The Bottom Line:
Judge Royce Lamberth has blocked Trump’s executive order halting gender transition procedures in federal prisons.
This decision allows controversial and costly medical interventions to continue on the taxpayer’s dime.
It also paves the way for more legal challenges to Trump-era policies, reflecting a judiciary increasingly willing to override executive authority in favor of activist rulings.
Read Next
– Dem Leader Jasmine Crockett Vows To Impeach Trump If Dems Win Back The House
– Massive Oil Reserve Back in Play After Trump Lifts Biden Clampdown
– Just Before the Boulder Terror Attack Colorado Dems Passed Law Shielding Criminal Illegals From ICE
– California Caves on Green Big Rig Mandates After Court Battle