A federal court has affirmed the U.S. government’s authority to enforce immigration laws over local objections, potentially bolstering national deportation efforts.
Key Facts:
– The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the federal government can deport illegal immigrants despite local opposition.
– The decision upheld a lower court’s ruling against King County Executive Dow Constantine’s 2019 order blocking ICE flights from a county airport near Seattle.
– The court found that Constantine’s order violated the Supremacy Clause and an agreement allowing federal use of the airport.
– The ruling reinforces federal authority over immigration enforcement and may aid the Trump administration’s deportation initiatives.
The Rest of The Story:
In 2019, King County Executive Dow Constantine issued an order preventing federal immigration authorities from using King County International Airport for deportation flights.
The directive prohibited fixed base operators from servicing ICE charter flights, aiming to hinder the deportation of illegal immigrants from the area.
The federal government sued, arguing that the order violated the Supremacy Clause and an agreement dating back to World War II that allowed federal use of the airport.
A district court sided with the government, and King County appealed.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the lower court’s decision, stating that the county’s order unlawfully interfered with federal immigration operations and discriminated against the government.
Good news. "The federal government has the authority to deport foreign nationals in the U.S. illegally over the objection of local authorities, a panel of three judges on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled." pic.twitter.com/XQrRNL7XVd
— Tammy Bruce (@HeyTammyBruce) December 3, 2024
Commentary:
This ruling is a significant victory for the rule of law, affirming that the federal government holds primacy in immigration matters.
Local authorities should not obstruct national policies, especially when those policies are crucial for maintaining the integrity of our borders and the enforcement of laws passed by Congress.
By upholding the Supremacy Clause, the court ensures that individual counties cannot impose their own ideologies over federal mandates.
This decision not only supports lawful deportations but also strengthens the Trump administration’s efforts to address illegal immigration effectively.
It’s a necessary step toward securing our nation and upholding the laws that protect our citizens.
The message is clear: sanctuary policies that interfere with federal law enforcement will not stand.
Upholding federal authority in immigration matters benefits the entire country by promoting a consistent and orderly approach to immigration enforcement.
The Bottom Line:
The Ninth Circuit’s decision reinforces federal supremacy in immigration enforcement, ensuring that local governments cannot obstruct national policies.
READ NEXT: Largest Gold Deposit in the World Was Just Discovered, Value Estimated at $83 Billion
This ruling supports the enforcement of immigration laws and strengthens efforts to maintain secure and orderly borders.