Federal Judge Blocks Trump Admin’s Effort to Expose Government Waste, Trump, Vance Fire Back

President Trump’s administration is challenging a federal judge’s ruling that blocks Elon Musk’s DOGE team from accessing Treasury Department data. The White House argues that the decision is unconstitutional and interferes with the executive branch’s authority to investigate government waste.

Key Facts:

  • A federal judge ruled against the Trump administration, blocking Elon Musk’s DOGE team from accessing Treasury Department data.
  • The ruling prevents even Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent from reviewing the information.
  • Vice President JD Vance and other White House officials condemned the decision as judicial overreach.
  • Trump called the ruling “very disappointing” and suggested no judge should have such power.
  • Musk labeled the judge “corrupt” and called for his impeachment.

BEAT THE CENSORS, GET OUR FREE ‘MORNING NEWSWIRE’ AND NEVER MISS A STORY

The Rest of The Story:

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, was working with the Treasury Department to identify and eliminate wasteful spending.

However, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer issued a ruling blocking DOGE officials from accessing sensitive Treasury data, including social security numbers and bank account details.

The White House has strongly opposed the ruling, arguing that it oversteps the court’s authority and hinders legitimate executive functions.

Vice President JD Vance and Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller both criticized the decision, stating that unelected bureaucrats are using the judiciary to resist accountability.

New York Attorney General Letitia James has filed a lawsuit, claiming that DOGE’s actions could disrupt essential government programs.

The Trump administration, however, insists that the effort is solely focused on eliminating inefficiency and corruption.

Commentary:

This ruling is a blatant overreach by an activist judge who appears more interested in protecting entrenched government interests than upholding the Constitution.

The executive branch has clear authority over its departments, including the Treasury, and the courts have no business interfering with how a president directs his administration.

BEAT THE CENSORS, GET OUR FREE ‘MORNING NEWSWIRE’ AND NEVER MISS A STORY

If unelected judges can dictate what data government officials may access, then the executive branch is effectively neutered.

The Constitution grants the president authority over the executive agencies, and this ruling directly undermines that power.

It’s no surprise that Musk, Vance, and other administration officials are calling this out for what it is—judicial interference in legitimate governance.

The judge’s claim that DOGE should not have access to the data ignores the fact that waste and fraud are rampant in Washington.

If the government is serious about accountability, it must allow oversight, not block it.

This decision must be overturned on appeal.

Allowing it to stand would set a dangerous precedent where courts dictate executive policy.

If bureaucrats are shielded from scrutiny, waste will continue unchecked, at the taxpayers’ expense.

The Trump administration is right to fight back.

The Bottom Line:

A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration’s efforts to investigate government waste, sparking strong opposition from the White House.

This ruling undermines executive authority and protects unaccountable bureaucrats from oversight.

If unchecked, it could signal a troubling shift where judges control executive functions, rather than elected leaders.

BEAT THE CENSORS, GET OUR FREE ‘MORNING NEWSWIRE’ AND NEVER MISS A STORY

Read Next

Pete Hegseth Shakes Up the Pentagon Press Room, Legacy Media Calls It ‘Deeply Shocking’

Trump Expands His Lawsuit Against CBS News After Release of Unedited 60 Minutes Interview

Former Anheuser-Busch President Spills the Beans on Bud Light’s Recovery Post-Mulvaney