Federal Judge Who Blocked Trump From Cutting Funds to Sanctuary Cities Has a Dirty Secret

President Trump’s executive order to cut off funding from sanctuary cities was blocked by a federal judge with a long history of financial and political support for top Democrats. The ruling has stirred concerns over judicial impartiality and the broader consequences for presidential authority.

Key Facts:

  • Judge William Orrick, an Obama appointee, blocked Trump’s executive orders targeting sanctuary cities.
  • The ruling claimed Trump’s orders violated the Constitution’s separation of powers, Spending Clause, and multiple amendments.
  • Orrick has donated more than $113,000 to Democratic politicians and committees, including Obama, Clinton, and Feinstein.
  • He held leadership roles in groups supporting Obama and Kerry and introduced Kamala Harris at a campaign fundraiser.
  • The orders Orrick struck down were titled “Protecting the American People Against Invasion” and “Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders.”

The Rest of The Story:

Judge William Orrick of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that President Trump’s executive orders withholding federal funding from sanctuary jurisdictions were unconstitutional.

Orrick said the orders were vague, coercive, and posed a threat to the constitutional structure by attempting to force local governments to enforce federal immigration policy.

The judge’s decision rested on multiple constitutional grounds, including the Fifth and Tenth Amendments, and the Spending Clause.

He wrote that threatening cities with loss of federal funds created “irreparable injury” and damaged trust between local governments and their communities.

His ruling blocks the Trump administration from using funding as leverage to compel compliance with federal immigration enforcement.

Commentary:

No federal judge who donates heavily to Democrat campaigns should be allowed to rule on cases involving a Republican president or conservative policies.

The appearance of bias isn’t just troubling—it’s undeniable.

Judge Orrick’s financial support for Democrat icons like Obama, Clinton, and Feinstein, along with his roles in political fundraising and event hosting, raise major red flags.

These aren’t small contributions or incidental affiliations.

This is a man who helped elect the very people whose ideology directly opposes Trump’s immigration agenda.

Orrick didn’t just donate—he chaired committees, hosted fundraisers, and introduced Harris to voters.

The line between judge and political operative is completely blurred.

This kind of judicial activism undermines the entire constitutional order.

When courts overstep and substitute ideology for law, they create a dangerous precedent.

The Founders never intended for judges to act as partisan enforcers.

The judiciary was meant to interpret the law, not nullify presidential action based on political preferences.

We’re reaching a breaking point.

If unelected judges can block constitutional executive authority because they disagree politically, the balance of power collapses.

The president may need to start ignoring rulings that go beyond the judicial role and openly defy constitutional limits.

Activist judges like Orrick are playing a short game that risks long-term disaster.

They think they’re stopping Trump, but what they’re really doing is gutting faith in the courts.

At some point, they will regret the day they decided their opinions mattered more than the will of the voters and the authority of the Constitution.

The Bottom Line:

Judge Orrick’s ruling against Trump’s sanctuary city orders reflects not just a legal disagreement but a deeper crisis of judicial credibility.

With over $113,000 in Democrat donations and a history of campaign activism, Orrick’s impartiality is highly questionable.

This case is a warning: when judges become partisans in robes, the very foundation of the republic is at risk.

Sign Up For The TFPP Wire Newsletter

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You may opt out at any time.

Read Next

Activist Federal Judge Makes Decision in Kilmar Abrego Garcia Case

Second Federal Judge Orders Trump Admin to Return Another Criminal From El Salvador

Iconic Weight Loss Company to File For Bankruptcy Within Weeks

Idiot Scientists Set to Dim The Sun ‘Within Weeks’ to Stop Climate Change

Nationwide Fast Food Chain Set to Close Hundreds of Restaurants