A Salvadoran national accused of violent crimes was mistakenly deported, returned to the U.S. under court order, and now faces potential release pending trial—despite likely ICE detention. The judge’s release conditions shocked many, even as federal authorities plan to override them.
Key Facts:
- Kilmar Abrego Garcia was mistakenly deported in March and returned to the U.S. under court order.
- He faces multiple federal charges stemming from a 2022 traffic stop.
- Judge Barbara Holmes ruled Garcia could be released into his brother’s custody if ICE does not detain him.
- Judge Holmes admitted ICE is likely to hold Garcia regardless, limiting her authority in the matter.
- Garcia’s release conditions include home detention, ankle monitoring, and bans on gang contact and firearms.
The Rest of The Story:
Kilmar Abrego Garcia appeared in federal court after his mistaken deportation to El Salvador was reversed under legal pressure.
Once back in U.S. custody, Garcia was indicted on federal charges tied to a 2022 incident.
His deportation, deemed an administrative error, prompted court battles stretching over months.
Judge Holmes found the government did not show Garcia posed a serious flight risk or threat to justice and thus ruled he could be released pending trial—if not taken into ICE custody.
“The Court will give Abrego the due process that he is guaranteed,” Holmes wrote.
Still, she acknowledged her decision may be moot, as ICE is expected to detain him.
Despite the ruling, ICE has jurisdiction over removal proceedings.
Garcia is likely to remain in custody and, if detained by ICE, could be moved out of Tennessee, further complicating access to his legal team.
NOW: Here's Judge Waverly Crenshaw's order denying DOJ's motion for a stay of a magistrate's determination that Kilmar Abrego Garcia should be released.
As Crenshaw notes, it's largely academic, as Garcia is expected to be held by DHS regardless. Link: https://t.co/xuiPIhElOG
— Jordan Fischer (@JordanOnRecord) June 25, 2025
Commentary:
The case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia is another glaring example of how far the judiciary has strayed from common sense in the post-Trump era.
Here is a man accused of being involved in gang activity, drugs, sex trafficking, and violent crimes, yet the court is bending over backward to ensure his release.
The decision to allow him to go free under ankle monitoring and live with his brother is outrageous.
This isn’t just about due process—it’s about public safety.
The federal court appears more interested in treating Garcia like a victim of bureaucratic error rather than someone with a serious criminal background.
The notion that an ankle monitor and a few restrictions are sufficient for someone with alleged MS-13 and Tren de Aragua affiliations is absurd.
What’s worse is how Garcia became a political pawn.
Democrat Senator Chris Van Hollen flew to El Salvador to push for Garcia’s return, using taxpayer dollars for a media stunt.
The political class rallied behind him not because of justice, but because it fit their narrative of victimized migrants.
Meanwhile, American communities are left to deal with the fallout of lenient rulings like this.
Thankfully, ICE is still in the picture.
The agency is under no obligation to follow Judge Holmes’ release conditions.
The chance they would actually let Garcia go is slim to none, and for good reason.
Immigration enforcement still retains the authority to detain him and begin removal proceedings.
This episode underscores the widening gulf between activist courts and law enforcement.
The judiciary’s soft stance threatens to undermine the public’s faith in the system.
When courts ignore credible threats and allow potentially dangerous individuals to re-enter society, it sends a disturbing message.
What message does it send to victims of violence and organized crime when the system favors the accused over the community?
What about law-abiding immigrants who go through the system the right way, only to see criminals gain sympathy and courtroom leniency?
The law exists to protect—not to gamble on a person’s willingness to follow rules after they’ve allegedly broken so many.
The courtroom should not be a platform for political gestures, but that’s what this has become.
The Bottom Line:
Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s case highlights serious flaws in the judicial system’s handling of criminal migrants.
Despite serious accusations, the court showed remarkable leniency in its ruling.
Thankfully, ICE’s authority may prevent this decision from endangering the public.
But the fact it was even considered speaks volumes about the direction of federal courts today.
Read Next
– RJK Jr. and Dr. Oz Announce Big Win for Patients: Insurance Industry Agrees to Drastic Reforms
– Freedom Wins: Short-Barrel Guns Now Legal Under Texas Law
– US Government Releases Video of ‘Disc-Shaped’ UFO With Abnormal Heat Signature
– Trump’s Profanity-Laced Warning Halts Israeli Assault After Iranian Broke the Ceasefire
– Court Backs AI’s Right to Use Stolen Books for Training—Trial on Piracy Still Looms
