As President Donald Trump faces legal roadblocks from federal judges, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has proposed a solution: Congress should strip courts of jurisdiction over certain cases to prevent them from obstructing Trump’s agenda.
Key Facts:
- DeSantis suggested on X that Congress has the power to remove federal court jurisdiction over key issues affecting Trump’s policies.
- He proposed attaching this measure to a “must-pass” bill to overcome Senate opposition.
- His comments were in response to Rep. Chip Roy, who advocated for defunding radical courts.
- Trump recently called for the impeachment of a federal judge, James Boasberg, whom he accused of being politically biased.
- Chief Justice John Roberts countered, stating that impeachment should not be used as a response to judicial decisions.
The Rest of The Story
DeSantis’ proposal stems from ongoing frustration over federal judges who have blocked elements of Trump’s policy agenda.
During his presidency, Trump saw key initiatives—such as immigration policies and military rules—halted by court rulings.
DeSantis argues that Congress has the constitutional authority to remove jurisdiction from federal courts on specific issues, preventing judges from interfering.
His idea gained traction after Rep. Chip Roy suggested Republicans should take aggressive steps to limit judicial power.
Roy’s post on X called for defunding radical courts and declaring an invasion at the border.
In response, DeSantis pointed out that jurisdiction stripping could be accomplished by attaching it to essential legislation, making it harder for Democrats to block.
Meanwhile, Trump has been vocal about what he sees as judicial overreach, going so far as to demand the impeachment of Judge Boasberg, who was appointed by former President Obama.
However, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts dismissed the idea, emphasizing that judicial decisions should be handled through normal appeals rather than impeachment.
Congress has the authority to strip jurisdiction of the federal courts to decide these cases in the first place.
The sabotaging of President Trump’s agenda by “resistance” judges was predictable — why no jurisdiction-stripping bills tee’d up at the onset of this Congress? https://t.co/OscAkpXgeo
— Ron DeSantis (@RonDeSantis) March 19, 2025
Commentary
DeSantis’ proposal taps into a long-standing frustration among conservatives who believe federal judges wield too much power in shaping policy.
His suggestion of jurisdiction stripping is a creative workaround, but it comes with major political and constitutional challenges.
First, even if the Republican-controlled House passed such a measure, it would face an uphill battle in the Senate, where 60 votes are needed to break a filibuster.
That means at least nine Democratic senators would have to support it—an unlikely scenario.
DeSantis’ idea of attaching it to a must-pass bill could force the issue, but that tactic is risky and could lead to political gridlock.
🚨 JUST IN: Florida Governor Ron DeSantis calls on Congress to strip the jurisdiction of federal courts to decide the cases dictating Trump's executive policies.
We NEED THIS.
"The sabotaging of President Trump’s agenda by “resistance” judges was predictable — why no… pic.twitter.com/ENJmGZKz2n
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 19, 2025
Second, the question of judicial authority looms large.
The judiciary is an independent branch of government, and while Congress has some control over its jurisdiction, the courts could push back.
The Supreme Court could rule that removing jurisdiction on certain issues violates constitutional separation of powers.
Finally, while conservatives generally support reigning in activist judges, there’s no clear consensus on how far Congress should go.
Some might argue that defunding courts or stripping jurisdiction sets a dangerous precedent that could be used by future administrations against conservative priorities.
The Bottom Line
DeSantis’ proposal is a strong statement against judicial overreach, but its path forward is uncertain.
While Congress technically has the power to limit court jurisdiction, political obstacles and constitutional questions make this solution difficult to implement.
If Republicans want to curb activist judges, they may need a broader strategy beyond just jurisdiction stripping.
Read Next
– Study Shows Hidden Ingredient Found in Common Herbs May Be Able to Reverse Alzheimer’s
– AARP and UnitedHealthcare: A ‘Shameful’ Partnership Under Fire for Recent Controversies
– Fort Myers, FL City Council Tearfully Holding Hands Blocks ICE Cooperation, Faces Backlash