Former FBI agent Peter Strzok has deleted all posts from his X account, just days after Tulsi Gabbard referred explosive documents to the DOJ alleging a coordinated attempt to undermine Donald Trump’s presidency.
Key Facts:
- Peter Strzok deleted all posts on X (formerly Twitter) on Monday.
- Tulsi Gabbard released documents July 18 alleging a “years-long coup” against President Trump.
- The documents were referred to the DOJ for criminal investigation; Strzok, Comey, and Brennan were named as potential targets.
- Strzok played a central role in the discredited Trump-Russia investigation and was fired from the FBI in 2018.
- He currently serves as an MSNBC contributor and Georgetown adjunct professor.
The Rest of The Story:
Strzok’s mass deletion of posts on X comes at a highly charged moment.
Just days earlier, former Congresswoman and current Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released a trove of documents suggesting top intelligence and law enforcement officials, including Strzok, may have participated in what she called a “years-long coup” to undermine Donald Trump’s presidency.
These records have now been referred to the Department of Justice for potential criminal charges.
Strzok was a key figure in the FBI’s investigation of alleged ties between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia.
Among his most controversial actions was his reported intervention to keep the investigation into Trump’s first national security advisor, Michael Flynn, from being shut down.
Strzok also helped validate the now-debunked Steele Dossier, which played a role in securing FISA warrants against Trump associates.
His text messages with then-FBI lawyer Lisa Page—his mistress at the time—revealed deep animus toward Trump, raising serious concerns about bias.
As Special Counsel John Durham later concluded in his May 2023 report, the FBI had “no corroboration” for many of the claims they pursued.
Despite his firing, Strzok remained defiant.
He rebranded himself as a frequent Trump critic on MSNBC and took an academic post at Georgetown University.
In a 2022 interview, he linked Trump’s foreign policy stance to Russian interests, stating, “Trump very much aligns with those,” referencing NATO skepticism and friendliness toward Vladimir Putin.
Commentary:
Peter Strzok’s decision to scrub his social media history is no coincidence—it looks like the move of a man anticipating legal trouble.
His central role in the Trump-Russia narrative has always stunk of bias and ambition, but this latest act of digital erasure raises red flags about what he might be trying to hide.
Strzok’s fingerprints are all over the early efforts to damage the Trump presidency from within.
He pushed the Russia investigation despite a lack of verified intelligence, manipulated internal processes, and worked behind the scenes to keep the Flynn probe alive. That’s not oversight—it’s sabotage.
His now-public communications with Lisa Page weren’t just unprofessional; they revealed a personal vendetta.
“We’ll stop him,” he wrote in one infamous text—referring to Trump.
This isn’t how law enforcement should operate in a constitutional republic.
Strzok may think his MSNBC spot and academic post insulate him, but his actions have consequences.
Deleting his posts after Tulsi Gabbard’s DOJ referral only strengthens the case that he has something to fear.
The fact that both Durham and Gabbard point directly to Strzok’s role in misusing federal power to kneecap an incoming president is serious.
When trusted institutions like the FBI are used as political weapons, accountability isn’t optional—it’s necessary.
Strzok was fired not just for poor judgment, but because his conduct eroded public trust in the FBI.
David Bowditch, then-deputy director, said in his termination draft that no other case had “more thoroughly damaged the reputation” of the Bureau.
That kind of disgrace can’t be ignored or forgiven simply because it’s politically convenient.
If the DOJ finds cause, Strzok should be indicted, tried, and if found guilty, imprisoned.
Anything less would be a green light for future abuses of power.
The Bottom Line:
Peter Strzok’s sudden deletion of all X posts adds a new layer to the deepening investigation into efforts to undermine Trump’s presidency.
His documented misconduct, bias, and role in peddling discredited narratives demand full legal scrutiny.
The American people deserve to know if their government was used against them—and those responsible must face justice.
Read Next
Ghislaine Maxwell Agrees to Testify Before Congress, But Only If These Four Demands Are Met
Police Charge Five After Brutal Late-Night Mob Assault in Cincinnati Caught on Video’
Sen. Kennedy Responds to NYC Shooting With a Blunt Message About Gun Laws