Gavin Newsom, California Democrats Plot Illegal Gerrymander To Increase Number of Dem House Seats

California Democrats are exploring two potential pathways to redraw congressional districts mid-decade, aiming to regain control of the U.S. House of Representatives. If successful, the move could wipe out several GOP-held seats and permanently shift the balance of power.

Key Facts:

  • California Democrats are considering redrawing congressional districts to flip Republican-held seats.
  • The push is partly in response to Texas considering a special redistricting session called by Gov. Greg Abbott.
  • Gov. Gavin Newsom is evaluating legal and legislative options to bypass or pause the state’s independent redistricting commission.
  • Targeted Republican seats include those held by Reps. Calvert, Kiley, Issa, Kim, Valadao, and LaMalfa.
  • In 2010, voters approved a measure to create an independent redistricting commission to prevent political manipulation.

The Rest of The Story:

California Democrats are openly strategizing to redraw congressional maps in a way that could eliminate multiple Republican seats.

This political maneuvering comes after reports that Texas Governor Greg Abbott is directing his legislature to explore similar redistricting efforts to increase representation.

Gov. Gavin Newsom justified California’s actions by saying of Texas, “They’re playing by a different set of rules.”

According to Punchbowl News, Democrats are weighing two main approaches.

The first is calling a special legislative session to propose a ballot measure that would either “pause” or eliminate the state’s independent redistricting commission.

That commission was established by Proposition 20 in 2010 and was meant to end political gerrymandering.

Any change would need voter approval in a costly special election.

One tactic being floated to make such a measure more appealing to voters is to include a popular Republican-backed provision, such as voter ID laws.

This could be used as political cover while altering redistricting laws under the radar.

The second option under review is more aggressive.

It involves declaring that California’s constitution does not forbid mid-decade redistricting, thereby justifying an immediate redraw of districts without voter input.

Newsom described it as “a novel legal question” that would likely end up in court.

Districts reportedly in the crosshairs include several Republican-leaning areas represented by Ken Calvert, Kevin Kiley, Darrell Issa, Young Kim, David Valadao, and Doug LaMalfa.

Rep. Mark Takano made the motivation clear: “We want our gavels back.”

Commentary:

If Gov. Newsom and his allies follow through with this plan, it should be seen as a direct threat to democratic process and constitutional order.

Stripping redistricting power from an independent commission in order to game the system isn’t reform—it’s raw political aggression.

This is not a policy debate or a difference of opinion. It’s a clear attempt to override the will of voters who supported nonpartisan redistricting back in 2010.

It undermines trust in the system, especially when Democrats are openly discussing ways to manipulate GOP voters by bundling election integrity measures like voter ID with radical proposals.

Should California pursue either of these schemes, legal challenges should be immediate and fierce.

Every inch of this should be contested in court.

And if state Democrats move forward regardless, President Trump would be fully justified in cutting off federal funds to California for engaging in what amounts to political insurrection.

This isn’t just a policy disagreement—it’s an open attempt to subvert electoral fairness for raw partisan gain.

Any politician, activist, or bureaucrat involved should face the full weight of legal accountability.

Prosecutors should evaluate whether such actions constitute abuse of office or violations of state and federal law.

America cannot afford to let one-party rule destroy representative government under the guise of “catching up” to Texas.

The entire premise—that California should do this because Texas might—is the logic of schoolyard politics, not statesmanship.

This also sets a dangerous precedent. If Democrats succeed in steamrolling California’s redistricting rules, it won’t be long before blue states nationwide follow suit.

What happens when election outcomes depend not on voters, but on which party is willing to break more rules?

The path forward must be firm: use every legal, political, and federal lever to shut down this scheme before it metastasizes.

The rule of law and electoral integrity are worth the fight.

The Bottom Line:

California Democrats are plotting a partisan power grab to redraw congressional maps mid-cycle, possibly ending GOP control in several districts.

This would upend voter-backed reforms and could trigger a constitutional crisis.

If allowed, it opens the door for electoral tampering on a national scale.

The courts—and the federal government—must intervene if this threat becomes reality.

Sign Up For The TFPP Wire Newsletter

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You may opt out at any time.

Read Next

Slimy Self Serving GOP Rep Abruptly Resigns From Congress, GOP House Majority Shrinks Further

House Speaker Johnson Sends Congress on Recess Early Over Epstein Votes

British Pharma Giant to Invest $50B in US Manufacturing, Will Create Tens of Thousands Of New High Paying Jobs

Why Are Legacy Media Outlets So Silent About Gabbards Explosive Russia Collusion Hoax Claims?

Cracker Barrel Gets Hit With Legal Complaint Over Its DEI Based Hiring Programs