Gay Nightclub Bans MAGA Gear For The Most Ridiculous Reason

California gay nightclub has banned customers from wearing MAGA attire, claiming it makes patrons feel unsafe—even though no issues were reported the night a man wore a Trump hat.

Key Facts:

  • Badlands nightclub in Sacramento banned MAGA-related clothing from the venue.
  • Owner TJ Bruce said the decision was to ensure patrons feel “comfortable and supported.”
  • The rule followed a visit by Steven Bourasa, who wore a MAGA hat and reported no incidents.
  • Bruce considered banning all political attire but chose only to target Trump-related gear.
  • Some in the local Lavender Heights area supported the bar’s decision.

Sign Up For The TFPP Wire Newsletter

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You may opt out at any time.

The Rest of The Story:

Badlands, a popular LGBTQIA+ nightclub in Sacramento, announced it will no longer allow MAGA-themed attire inside its venue.

The ban came shortly after a guest, Steven Bourasa, wore a red Trump campaign hat during a night out at the club.

According to Bourasa, his evening was peaceful, with no issues, and he even complimented the bar’s security team.

Despite this, the club’s owner, TJ Bruce, shared on social media that MAGA clothing would now be prohibited.

He framed the move as a way to keep the community feeling safe and supported.

Bruce emphasized that the rule wasn’t about banning political beliefs, but rather about managing the atmosphere in the space.

Some community members, like Alice Malmberg, said they understood the decision, pointing to national politics and how certain groups have been treated.

But others questioned why such a ban was necessary when no disturbance occurred.

Commentary:

This ban isn’t about safety—it’s about silencing views the bar’s patrons and owner don’t like.

A man quietly wears a MAGA hat, causes no trouble, and suddenly a public announcement is made that people like him are no longer welcome.

That’s not inclusion; it’s petty political censorship.

The left often accuses others of being intolerant, but this is what actual intolerance looks like.

A peaceful night out was enough to “trigger” people simply because of a red hat.

If that makes them feel “unsafe,” then they’re not ready for the real world.

Wearing a campaign hat should not be treated like an act of aggression.

This kind of response reveals a deep insecurity.

Instead of confronting different opinions or engaging in conversation, they retreat into their safe spaces and rewrite the rules.

It’s the same playbook over and over—shut down speech you don’t like and call it “protection.”

There’s also the legal side to consider.

Banning clothing that expresses political views may very well cross the line into viewpoint discrimination, especially in a public accommodation setting.

California has plenty of anti-discrimination laws—just not ones that seem to protect conservatives.

Don’t expect the state to enforce fairness here.

If anything, they’ll probably applaud it.

It’s hard not to imagine how the headlines would look if another bar banned Pride flags or Biden gear.

It would be front-page news and labeled hate.

But when the intolerance runs the other way, it’s suddenly acceptable.

The Bottom Line:

A Sacramento nightclub has decided MAGA gear is just too much for its patrons to handle, despite no problems occurring.

The move is less about safety and more about signaling which political views aren’t welcome.

It’s a textbook example of selective tolerance and should raise real questions about free expression in public venues.

Sign Up For The TFPP Wire Newsletter

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You may opt out at any time.

Read Next

The FBI Just Issued an Alert Regarding The Ongoing Attacks Against Tesla Vehicles, Chargers and Dealerships

After Chuck Schumer Threatens ‘Consequences’ For GOP Lawmakers, Speaker Mike Johnson Hits Back Hard

RFK Jr. Unveils New Tool Showing the Levels of Chemical Contaminants in Our Food