House Republicans are unveiling a bill to shut down the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, arguing that its activities conflict with Second Amendment rights.
Key Facts:
– Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo., introduced the bill with multiple co-sponsors.
– The proposal comes as some lawmakers claim the ATF’s role duplicates local regulations.
– Supporters say the Constitution places gun laws under state, not federal, authority.
– The agency gained attention for its involvement in high-profile cases like Waco.
– ATF Director Steven Dettelbach has cautioned that limiting the bureau could lead to more violence.
The Rest of The Story:
Rep. Burlison contends that the ATF’s existence is “unconstitutional” because he believes the federal government does not have the right to impose gun regulations.
He further insists the bureau has been asking local law enforcement to enforce rules that, in his view, go beyond the federal government’s powers.
The legislation has received backing from other Republicans, including Reps. Lauren Boebert, Andy Biggs, and Paul Gosar, who share Burlison’s concerns about federal gun restrictions.
Opponents of the plan, such as gun control advocates, say the ATF is vital for reducing crime.
Director Dettelbach recently warned that curbing the bureau’s role could lead to an increase in unsafe situations.
However, supporters of Burlison’s measure argue that local and state officials can effectively handle firearm matters without a federal agency.
Critics of the ATF often cite past incidents like Ruby Ridge and Waco, Texas, as examples where the federal government’s role in gun cases went too far.
Burlison has not confirmed conversations with President-elect Donald Trump’s team on the plan.
Still, some in Trump’s circle have voiced support for steps that preserve states’ authority over gun regulations.
Amid this debate, the bill’s future remains uncertain as it competes for attention in a divided Congress.
JUST IN: Representative @laurenboebert has introduced legislation to abolish the ATF.
Follow here for updates. pic.twitter.com/qc694YeJrn
— Congress Tracker (@QuiverCongress) January 6, 2025
The Bottom Line:
Burlison’s bill reflects a deep divide between lawmakers who want stronger federal enforcement and those who see firearms as a state matter.
READ NEXT: Meta Ends Fact Checking Program, Zuckerberg Promises Free Speech On Facebook, Instagram
Critics warn the move could remove needed federal oversight, but proponents say it will protect constitutional freedoms.