Insanity: California Democrats to Name Health Insurance Law After Accused Murderer

A proposed California ballot initiative could make it a felony for insurance companies to interfere with doctors’ medical decisions—while being named after a man accused of murdering a healthcare executive.

Key Facts:

The proposed initiative is named after Luigi Mangione, who allegedly killed a UnitedHealthcare executive.
The measure would make it illegal for insurers to delay, deny, or modify a treatment recommended by a licensed doctor.
Only a licensed physician could review or override another doctor’s medical decision on behalf of an insurer.
Violations could lead to felony charges, treble damages, and attorney’s fees in lawsuits against insurers.
Public comments on the measure are open through April 25 as the initiative is under review.

The Rest of The Story:

The initiative, recently submitted to the California Attorney General’s Office, aims to sharply restrict how health insurance companies handle claims.

Under the proposal, if a doctor recommends a treatment, insurers would be banned from second-guessing that recommendation—unless another physician working for the insurer makes the call.

Insurance companies would also face steep legal consequences if they delay care without proving with “clear and convincing evidence” that the procedure is unnecessary or wouldn’t result in harm.

Lawsuits could bring triple damages and attorney fees to patients.

While the text focuses on protecting patients, it’s drawing attention for another reason: its name.

The initiative is named after Luigi Mangione, the man accused of killing a UnitedHealthcare executive in December.

That detail is already generating fierce public and political reaction.

🚨 JUST IN: California leftists have introduced the “Luigi Mangione Act,” which is meant to further regulate health insurance companies

Democrats named this act after a literal COLD BLOODED MURDERER.

They’re GLORIFYING assassinations in the street.

California is very, very… pic.twitter.com/Xrjn6aOWfg

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) March 28, 2025

Commentary:

Let’s get something straight—protecting patients from corporate insurance games isn’t a bad idea.

But naming the bill after someone accused of murdering a healthcare executive is pure lunacy.

Only in California does glorifying a violent crime suspect seem like an acceptable political move.

This isn’t just tone-deaf—it’s twisted.

No matter how noble the intent, you can’t separate the policy from the symbolism.

And in this case, the message is loud and clear: if you kill a healthcare exec, California might name a law after you.

Democrats running that state seem to have learned nothing from recent elections.

They keep pushing ideas that treat criminals like heroes and vilify business, especially industries like healthcare that already operate under massive regulations.

Voters around the country see what’s happening in California and shake their heads.

It’s why people are fleeing the state, and why its politics have become a cautionary tale instead of a model.

If Democrats want to push patient-first policies, fine—let them.

But to build it on the back of a tragic murder case?

That’s beyond poor judgment.

That’s ideology run wild.

And honestly, if they keep heading down this path, they’re only hurting their own chances in the long run.

So let them keep writing laws like this.

The rest of America will be watching—and voting accordingly.

The Bottom Line:

California’s latest healthcare proposal goes beyond reform—it veers into dangerous territory by honoring a man accused of murder.

While protecting patient rights is a worthy cause, the decision to name the bill after an alleged killer sends the wrong message.

Once again, the Golden State proves it’s more interested in symbolism than sensible policy.