Tulsi Gabbard, serving as Director of National Intelligence, bypassed CIA objections to release a minimally redacted report exposing how the Obama administration pushed the discredited Trump-Russia collusion narrative. The move, backed by President Trump and top officials, has sparked sharp political and intelligence community backlash.
Key Facts:
- DNI Tulsi Gabbard declassified and released a 46-page House Intelligence report on the origins of the Trump-Russia probe.
- President Trump, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and Attorney General Pam Bondi supported the release; other intelligence officials opposed it.
- The report alleges former CIA Director John Brennan and others fabricated the collusion narrative and suppressed contrary intelligence.
- Senator Mark Warner called the declassification “desperate and irresponsible,” warning it could compromise sensitive intelligence sources.
- Bondi has formed a DOJ strike force to investigate the findings, with possible subpoenas for former President Obama.
The Rest of The Story:
Gabbard’s decision came after weeks of internal debate within the intelligence community. According to sources, the CIA submitted its own list of redactions, but Gabbard had final authority and declined to adopt most of them. Trump signed off on a version with “minimal redactions and no edits.”
The released report accuses senior Obama-era intelligence officials, including former CIA Director John Brennan, of manufacturing evidence and ignoring intelligence that contradicted the collusion theory. It claims they knowingly misled the public and violated internal standards to support a false narrative.
In her public statement, Gabbard called the findings evidence of “the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history.” She argued the Obama administration and allied media outlets worked together to “undermine the legitimacy” of Trump’s presidency in what she described as a years-long coup attempt.
Democrats pushed back. Senator Mark Warner argued the disclosure jeopardized critical intelligence operations and sent a dangerous signal to U.S. allies. Obama’s office dismissed the allegations as “outrageous” and “bizarre.”
Following the report’s release, Bondi referred its contents to the DOJ and announced the creation of a strike force to pursue investigations. House Speaker Mike Johnson said Congress may subpoena Obama to answer questions about his alleged role. Trump, for his part, called Obama “guilty” of treason.
Commentary:
This release confirms what many have long suspected—that senior intelligence officials were not simply mistaken but actively involved in shaping and pushing the false Trump-Russia narrative. The fact that Gabbard had to override resistance from within the intelligence community speaks volumes about how deep this cover-up ran.
Given that these same agencies were complicit in fueling the hoax, it is unsurprising they fought to keep the full report from public view. At the eleventh hour, efforts to redact large portions suggest they were still trying to protect themselves from exposure.
There is every indication this battle is far from over. The DNI’s confrontation with entrenched intelligence elements signals an ongoing struggle over what remains hidden. Americans deserve full transparency, and every remaining document should be released without political filters.
If the allegations stand, accountability must be non-negotiable. Those involved—from senior officials down to anyone who knowingly advanced the falsehood—must face legal consequences. Prosecutors should treat this as the most significant political scandal in modern U.S. history.
Public trust in the intelligence community has already suffered irreparable harm. The only path to restoring it is through complete exposure of the truth and consequences for every individual involved. The names must be made public. Their actions must be taught in history classes—not as a cautionary tale of political rivalry, but as a warning about how far unelected officials will go to subvert the will of the people.
Until that happens, the public will continue to question the motives of those charged with defending the nation’s security. And they should. Trust must be earned, not assumed.
The Bottom Line:
The declassification of the Trump-Russia report by DNI Gabbard marks a rare break in the intelligence community’s wall of secrecy. It exposes deep divisions within the national security apparatus and raises serious allegations of political manipulation at the highest levels.
Whether the investigations lead to prosecutions remains to be seen, but the stakes are clear: this is about holding powerful people accountable and ensuring such abuses of power are never repeated. The fight for full disclosure is only beginning.
![Rep. Crockett: ‘Once Trump Got in the Second Time, They Decided The [KKK] Hoods Were Off’](https://tfppwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Screenshot-2025-08-09-14.05.14-1024x538.jpg)
