Rep. Jasmine Crockett has fired back at a scathing *New York Post* report accusing her of mistreating staff, skipping work, and demanding VIP treatment. In a spirited on-camera response, Crockett dismissed the claims as “more slander, more nonsense, more lies,” and said the criticism only fuels her resolve.
Key Facts:
- The *New York Post* published allegations from former staffers accusing Crockett of being a “diva” who berates employees, skips her D.C. office, and prioritizes media appearances over constituent work.
- Crockett responded publicly, calling the accusations false and rooted in the heightened scrutiny she faces as a young Black woman in politics.
- She invoked Beyoncé, saying, “If they’re not talking about you, then obviously you must not be doing anything.”
- Her remarks framed the criticism as proof she’s “getting under their skin” and vowed to keep being “loud and proud on behalf of the American people.”
- The original report also alleged she demanded luxury rental cars, cut in front of disabled passengers at an airport, and dismissed staff concerns over derogatory language.
The Rest of The Story:
The *New York Post* report relied on accounts from multiple former aides who claimed Crockett avoids her congressional office, mistreats staff, and uses taxpayer-funded resources for personal convenience. The sources alleged she requires luxury SUVs like Escalades for short trips, insists staff open doors for her, and focuses more on securing national media appearances than on legislative duties or district concerns.
The report also highlighted past incidents, such as allegedly skipping ahead of wheelchair-bound passengers at an airport and brushing off gay staffers’ objections to her use of the term “butch” toward GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. Staff turnover, sources claimed, has been unusually high due to what they described as a toxic work environment.
Crockett, however, sees the controversy differently. Asked directly if she is a “no-show boss from hell who terrorizes staffers,” she laughed and replied:
“Oh my goodness. Listen, I know that I have arrived, honey. That is the way that I see this. Because, as Beyoncé says, if they’re not talking about you, then obviously you must not be doing anything. You know what? This is just more slander, more nonsense, more lies. And, honestly, I don’t think that the New York Post would probably be the first ones to be able to figure out if I was a boss from hell.”
She linked the criticism to what she views as disproportionate scrutiny:
“There’s a lot of scrutiny that comes my way, and it comes my way from all different angles… when people start talking about you, that’s when you know that you are obviously getting under their skin.”
Her parting shot was defiant:
“Your hate is my motivation, so keep hating. All it does is motivate me to continue to do what I do, which is to be loud and proud on behalf of the American people.”
Commentary:
Crockett’s response is telling—not just for what she denies, but for how she reframes the accusations. Rather than addressing the specific claims about staff treatment, absenteeism, and lavish perks, she pivots to a narrative of persecution and personal resilience.
Given her public persona, the allegations hardly seem out of character. On-camera, she thrives on sharp exchanges and viral moments, often projecting a confident, combative style. It’s not difficult to imagine that same energy, unchecked, translating into a difficult working environment for staff.
Her dismissal of the *Post* report as “slander” sidesteps the fact that multiple former employees—many unnamed for fear of retaliation—shared consistent stories. Instead, she treats the criticism as validation of her political relevance, citing Beyoncé lyrics to bolster her point.
This approach may play well with supporters who admire her brashness, but it does little to reassure constituents that she takes the substance of the allegations seriously. The luxury car demands, office absences, and public rudeness to disabled passengers, if true, point to deeper issues of entitlement and misplaced priorities.
Her claim that race and gender fuel the scrutiny is not new in politics, but it risks being seen as a shield against accountability. Public service demands humility, attention to constituent needs, and respect for the staff who make the office run.
If Crockett’s critics are right, her focus is less on legislating and more on cultivating her image. And if her voters tolerate that, they shouldn’t be surprised when their representation in Washington looks more like a personal brand campaign than a serious legislative effort.
Ultimately, her defiance may rally her base, but it won’t erase the questions about her fitness for office. Whether she’s telling the truth or spinning damage control, the voters will decide if the performance outweighs the allegations.
The Bottom Line:
Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s fiery rebuttal to accusations of diva-like behavior and staff abuse shifts the conversation from specifics to a broader claim of being unfairly targeted. While she calls the allegations “lies” and “motivation,” former aides’ accounts suggest a troubling pattern of entitlement and disengagement.
Her refusal to directly engage the details may keep her brand intact with supporters, but it leaves lingering doubts about her leadership style and commitment to her constituents.
