Jasmine Crockett’s Melania Attack Implodes—Public Record Shreds Her Claims

Rep. Jasmine Crockett went on the warpath against First Lady Melania Trump, claiming the First Lady’s “Einstein visa” was unearned. But her argument fell apart under facts published by the New York Times seven years ago.

Key Facts:

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) questioned the legitimacy of Melania Trump’s “Einstein visa” during a recent attack on Republicans.
Melania Trump was granted an EB-1 visa in 2001 for individuals with “extraordinary ability.”
Crockett claimed Melania had none of the required accolades for such a visa, citing Nobel Prizes and Olympic medals as examples.
The New York Times published a detailed 2018 report affirming Melania met the EB-1 criteria based on her modeling career and media presence.
Despite this, Crockett used Melania’s visa as a talking point to accuse Republicans of hypocrisy on immigration policy.

The Rest of The Story:

In a pointed floor speech, Rep. Jasmine Crockett criticized First Lady Melania Trump’s 2001 EB-1 “Einstein visa,” implying it was unearned.

She cited the visa’s intended purpose—to reward individuals with extraordinary achievements like Nobel or Pulitzer prizes—and concluded that Melania didn’t meet the standard.

“It doesn’t take an Einstein to see that the math ain’t mathing here,” Crockett quipped.

However, Crockett ignored an extensive 2018 New York Times article that directly addressed this question.

The EB-1 visa requires applicants to meet three out of ten possible criteria, including high salary, media coverage, or artistic exhibitions.

Melania had been featured in major magazines like British GQ and Sports Illustrated, which satisfied the published standards.

Chris Wright, an immigration attorney interviewed by the Times, dismissed the myth that the visa requires genius status: “The notion that you somehow have to be a genius or Einstein is utter fiction.”

In fact, when Einstein’s early work was evaluated anonymously by immigration lawyers, it reportedly “would be very challenging” for him to qualify under current EB-1 rules.

Commentary:

It’s stunning that a sitting member of Congress—who is also a licensed attorney—would broadcast such an uninformed opinion in a public forum.

Jasmine Crockett is not some fresh-faced intern.

She is more than old enough to remember Donald Trump’s first term, the media firestorm surrounding Melania’s visa, and the resulting fact-checks.

This wasn’t an off-the-cuff remark.

It was a prepared statement rooted in a claim that had already been thoroughly debunked by the mainstream media Crockett typically supports.

The New York Times itself—far from a right-leaning outlet—explained that Melania had, in fact, qualified under the law.

By falsely portraying Melania as unqualified, Crockett not only insulted a former First Lady but cheapened the real concerns Americans have about immigration abuses.

Her statements suggest a willingness to ignore the law for the sake of partisan jabs.

What’s worse is the performative nature of it all.

Crockett attempted to project a folksy, down-to-earth tone—“the math ain’t mathing”—while promoting a misleading claim.

It’s as if, in her rush to appeal to the lower common denominator, she intentionally dumbed down both her rhetoric and her standards of truth.

This kind of behavior isn’t harmless.

It’s part of a larger strategy among Democrats to undermine anything associated with the Trump family—even if it requires ignoring established facts or twisting the law.

As Trump racks up policy wins—including the obliteration of Iran’s nuclear capabilities concluding with a cease fire agreement between Iran and Israel—it’s no surprise that opponents are resorting to character smears.

But this one fell flat.

Americans deserve more from their elected officials than recycled falsehoods and cheap insults disguised as advocacy.