A Texas judge has rejected an effort to require mandatory gender testing in NCAA women’s sports, dealing a blow to efforts aimed at keeping biological males from competing against female athletes. The ruling comes despite strong testimony from former female collegiate athletes and support from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.
Key Facts:
- Lubbock County Judge Les Hatch ruled against an injunction demanding mandatory gender testing for NCAA athletes.
- Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed the lawsuit, arguing the NCAA’s revised policy doesn’t go far enough.
- Three former female collegiate athletes testified about their experiences competing against trans athletes.
- Critics worry that the current policy could still allow biological males to compete in women’s sports through altered birth certificates.
- The NCAA defended its updated rules, stating they comply with President Trump’s executive order banning male athletes from women’s categories.
The Rest of The Story
The lawsuit sought to enforce stricter gender verification standards to prevent biological males from competing in women’s sports.
Texas AG Ken Paxton, along with several former female collegiate athletes, argued that the NCAA’s current approach is inadequate and allows loopholes for trans athletes to gain access to women’s competitions.
The NCAA’s updated policy, following a directive from President Trump, officially bans biological males from women’s sports.
However, Paxton and other critics say the policy still lacks proper enforcement, as it relies on birth certificates, which can be legally amended in 44 states.
Despite compelling testimony from former female athletes who shared firsthand experiences of unfair competition and locker room discomfort, Judge Hatch ruled against the request for mandatory gender testing.
The decision was met with frustration from those advocating for stronger protections for women’s sports.
In Lubbock, Texas for NCAA court case; Texas Attorney General @KenPaxtonTX and his team have sued the NCAA for “deceptive trade practices” because they continue to allow men to compete in women’s sports, but they market and advertise these events as “women’s” events. Several… pic.twitter.com/rkApPeC0rI
— Jonathan Saenz (@jonathansaenzTX) March 18, 2025
Commentary
This ruling is yet another example of the legal system failing to protect female athletes from an agenda that prioritizes ideology over fairness.
Women’s sports exist for a reason—because biological differences between men and women are undeniable.
Yet, we are now expected to pretend those differences don’t matter.
It is absurd that female athletes, who train their entire lives to compete at the highest level, are forced to share the field with biological males.
These women have spoken out, yet their voices continue to be ignored in favor of policies designed to appease activists rather than protect competition integrity.
The NCAA’s reliance on birth certificates is laughable.
Allowing documents to be changed after birth completely undermines any effort to maintain fair play.
The fact that 44 states permit this loophole should alarm anyone who truly values fairness in women’s sports.
Paxton’s lawsuit was a necessary step in the fight to restore common sense.
Judge Hatch’s ruling may be a setback, but it is not the end.
The movement to safeguard women’s sports from political activism will continue, and those who refuse to acknowledge biological reality will eventually have to answer for the harm they are causing to female athletes.
The Bottom Line
This ruling sets a dangerous precedent that weakens protections for women in sports.
Without clear and enforceable standards, biological males will continue to gain access to women’s competition, undermining decades of progress.
This fight is far from over, and supporters of women’s athletics must continue to push back against policies that erase biological distinctions in the name of inclusivity.
Read Next
– Study Shows Hidden Ingredient Found in Common Herbs May Be Able to Reverse Alzheimer’s
– AARP and UnitedHealthcare: A ‘Shameful’ Partnership Under Fire for Recent Controversies
– Fort Myers, FL City Council Tearfully Holding Hands Blocks ICE Cooperation, Faces Backlash