A federal judge has accused the Trump administration of willfully disobeying a court order to halt deportations under the Alien Enemies Act. The decision marks a major clash between the executive branch and the judiciary, with potential criminal charges on the table.
Key Facts:
- U.S. District Judge James Boasberg found probable cause to hold the Trump administration in criminal contempt.
- The contempt ruling involves deportations under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, used only three other times in U.S. history.
- Boasberg claims the administration “spirited out” over 100 Venezuelans in defiance of a court order.
- The Supreme Court later found the order legally flawed but said it didn’t excuse the government’s disobedience.
- Boasberg was appointed by President Obama and previously nominated to local court by President Bush.
The Rest of the Story: Legal Showdown Over Rarely Used Law
Judge James Boasberg declared that the Trump administration had violated his March 15 temporary restraining order by continuing deportations and ignoring a judicial mandate.
These deportations were made under the Alien Enemies Act—a law rarely invoked, and only during wartime until now.
Despite the Supreme Court later ruling that the order was procedurally defective, Boasberg emphasized that this didn’t absolve the executive branch of responsibility for violating it.
His ruling opens the door for identifying and potentially prosecuting officials involved in the deportations.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other top Trump figures were cited for openly celebrating the flights on social media.
Boasberg stopped short of mandating that deported individuals be brought back, but he gave the administration an opportunity to suggest how it would come into compliance.
Commentary: Judicial Overreach Threatens National Sovereignty
This ruling by Judge Boasberg isn’t just about a legal technicality—it’s an escalation in the judiciary’s war against a duly elected president trying to enforce the law.
His contempt charge feels less like a legal judgment and more like political theater designed to embarrass and obstruct.
By targeting the administration over the use of the Alien Enemies Act—a legitimate and constitutional tool—Boasberg shows his hostility to any enforcement of immigration laws that go against progressive orthodoxy.
The fact that this law has been used only a few times in American history doesn’t mean it’s invalid.
It means it’s reserved for serious national security situations, and that’s exactly how President Trump used it.
The bigger problem here is what this episode reveals: a judiciary that believes it can override the elected executive, even in matters of national security.
When a judge openly defies a president’s ability to deport individuals identified as threats, it sets a dangerous precedent.
It sends a signal that judges, not voters, get the final say.
Even the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision acknowledged the need for judicial review—but through habeas proceedings, not blanket judicial fiat.
Boasberg is twisting this into a power grab, trying to hold administration officials criminally liable for upholding the law.
This isn’t justice—it’s sabotage.
The American people, 74% of whom support stronger deportation enforcement, are being sidelined by an unelected judge with a political agenda.
The courts must remember their role is to interpret the law—not rewrite immigration policy from the bench.
If the Supreme Court wants to maintain its authority, it must step in and rein in these activist judges.
Otherwise, we’re headed toward a constitutional crisis where the bench dictates policy instead of applying the law.
The Bottom Line:
Judge Boasberg’s contempt ruling against the Trump administration underscores growing tensions between the judiciary and the executive.
By treating policy disagreements as criminal acts, the court risks undermining democratic governance.
The Supreme Court must intervene to restore balance and respect for the rule of law.
Read Next
– New Study Shows Common Medical Test Could Be Causing Up To 5% of All Cancer Diagnoses Each Year
– Eco-Alarmists Have a New Target, You’re Not Going to Believe This One