If the intelligence documents are accurate, Russia had serious dirt on Hillary Clinton’s health and campaign conduct in 2016—and chose not to use it. That silence may shift how we view claims about Russian interference in that election.
Key Facts:
- Newly declassified documents from 2020 show Russia knew about Hillary Clinton’s serious health issues and questionable campaign tactics in 2016.
- The Russian SVR reportedly had access to internal DNC emails and communications linking Clinton to efforts to discredit Trump and obstruct her own email investigation.
- Russian intelligence allegedly knew of secret U.S. meetings offering patronage and funding in post-Soviet countries in exchange for support of Clinton.
- The report challenges the 2017 intelligence assessment that Putin wanted Trump to win, suggesting Putin may have preferred Clinton as a weaker, compromised leader.
- The revelations came from a House Intelligence Committee report released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence under Tulsi Gabbard.
The Rest of The Story:
The report, dated September 2020, criticizes the U.S. intelligence community for relying on questionable sources in its 2017 findings about Russian election interference.
It outlines a different picture—one where Russian intelligence agencies had alarming information about Clinton’s physical and psychological condition.
According to their data, top Democrats, including President Obama, were deeply concerned about her health.
More troubling are the allegations that Clinton’s campaign was involved in attempts to manipulate public opinion and interfere in the FBI’s investigation into her use of a private email server.
One intercepted Clinton campaign email allegedly revealed a plan to “link Putin and Russian hackers to candidate Trump” to distract from her scandal.
The Russian SVR also reportedly had communications showing the DOJ may have tipped off Clinton’s staff about the investigation’s progress.
The report also suggests that U.S. officials may have offered deals to Russian-aligned religious organizations and promised influence in former Soviet regions in exchange for Russian support of Clinton’s candidacy.
🚨🚨REVEALED:
The Department of Justice has just confirmed a bombshell — not only did Barack Obama personally order the DOJ not to arrest Hillary Clinton for espionage, he also directed the Comey-led FBI to shut down the investigation entirely.
CIA John Ratcliffe: “Lisa Page… pic.twitter.com/xAVMzh3Nz9
— 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) July 22, 2025
Commentary:
If this report is even partly true, it paints a deeply disturbing picture.
Imagine if Clinton’s health problems—already suspected by some—were known by Russia and the DNC alike but never revealed to the public. That alone raises questions of transparency and accountability.
Worse, if the Russians had this information and held it back, it shatters the widely held narrative that Putin wanted Trump to win. Let’s flip the script.
If Donald Trump had hidden serious health issues during the 2016 campaign, and Russia had that information but stayed quiet, the media would still be running wall-to-wall coverage on collusion and cover-ups.
But because this involved Clinton, we’re told to move along—nothing to see here.
This isn’t just about Clinton’s fitness to lead. It’s about how far Democrats were willing to go to secure power, including dangling State Department access to Russian actors.
If true, that’s more than political hardball—it’s foreign policy for sale. And no, Trump wasn’t the one selling it.
Then there’s the Clinton email scandal. The report claims the DOJ was feeding updates to Clinton insiders.
That’s a potential abuse of power by government officials to protect a candidate during a criminal probe.
And it deserves fresh investigation—especially given how that scandal was swept aside while Trump faced years of probes over far less substantiated claims.
All this makes the intelligence community’s 2017 conclusions seem more like political spin than sound analysis.
If Putin truly thought Clinton was easier to manipulate—given her baggage and the leverage Russian intel claimed to hold—then the claim he helped Trump becomes less plausible.
He didn’t leak any of this during the campaign, even when it might’ve made a real difference. That’s not the move of a man invested in Trump winning.
In the end, it’s not just that Democrats lost in 2016. It’s that they couldn’t accept the loss without blaming it on a foreign boogeyman.
Now, years later, the real story is emerging. And it looks like the wrong campaign was playing dirty—and getting help from all the wrong places.
The Bottom Line:
The newly released intelligence report suggests Russia may have preferred Hillary Clinton in 2016 due to her vulnerabilities and the leverage they held over her.
It also reveals Clinton’s team may have attempted to manipulate public perception and obstruct justice.
The real collusion may not have been with Trump at all—but within the DNC and State Department.
This report raises serious questions that demand renewed investigation.
Read Next
– Gavin Newsom, California Democrats Plot Illegal Gerrymander To Increase Number of Dem House Seats
– Soros-Funded Groups Throw Support Behind GOP Bill Offering Legal Status to Millions