Obama Judge Dismisses Charges Against 100+ Illegals Accused of Trespassing Into New Mexico Military Zone

A federal magistrate judge dismissed trespassing charges against nearly 100 illegal aliens caught crossing into a military-protected border area in New Mexico, raising questions about the judiciary’s role in enforcing national security laws.

Key Facts:

Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory Wormuth dismissed charges against nearly 100 illegal aliens in Las Cruces, New Mexico.
The charges were for trespassing into a newly designated National Defense Area along the New Mexico-Mexico border.
President Trump recently brought this 170-mile strip under Department of Defense control via Title 50 of the U.S. Code.
The judge cited probable cause issues and questioned whether signs were clearly posted to warn of the restricted zone.
The defendants remain in federal custody on separate charges of illegal entry under immigration law.

The Rest of The Story:

In early May, the federal government began charging illegal border crossers in New Mexico under Title 50, a law normally reserved for protecting military zones.

This change came after President Trump declared a 170-mile stretch of the southern border a National Defense Area to enhance national security.

The order gave the Department of Defense temporary jurisdiction over the area, treating it like an extension of Fort Huachuca.

Following the new designation, the U.S. Attorney’s office filed over 100 criminal cases related to trespassing on this protected land.

However, Judge Gregory Wormuth dismissed nearly all of those cases, ruling that prosecutors failed to demonstrate the defendants knowingly entered the military-controlled area.

Wormuth claimed the government did not offer sufficient proof that warning signs were visible, readable, or properly placed.

Although the trespassing charges were dropped, the individuals remain in custody for violating immigration laws under Title 8.

The dismissal stirred concerns about the legal standards being applied to border enforcement amid growing national security threats.

Commentary:

Judge Gregory Wormuth’s ruling is yet another example of judicial activism standing in the way of real border enforcement.

When nearly 100 illegal aliens can invade a military-controlled zone and walk away without trespassing convictions, something is deeply broken in our legal system.

This was not a vague or ordinary piece of land.

President Trump clearly designated it as a National Defense Area for one reason—to protect the American people.

The idea that illegal entrants might not have known they were trespassing because a sign may not have been perfectly placed is an absurd standard that no ordinary citizen could rely on in court.

When judges like Wormuth nitpick technicalities instead of enforcing the law, they send a dangerous message: sovereignty and national defense take a backseat to the feelings and awareness of foreign violators.

If they didn’t see the sign, too bad—the land is still off-limits.

President Trump is doing what he was elected to do—secure the border and defend this nation.

But when the judiciary works against that mission, the president may have no choice but to act outside their interference.

That includes suspending habeas corpus for foreign nationals and removing activist judges from the enforcement equation entirely.

We cannot allow unelected legal bureaucrats to obstruct policies meant to protect American families and military installations.

Either the courts align with the will of the people and the Constitution, or they will become irrelevant as the executive branch moves forward with the mandate it received from voters.

If the judiciary keeps protecting lawbreakers, it’s not just illegal aliens who will cross the line—so will the limits of patience from law-abiding Americans.

The Bottom Line:

Judge Wormuth’s dismissal of charges weakens national security enforcement at a time when strong borders are essential.

The ruling reflects a broader pattern of legal roadblocks preventing meaningful immigration reform.

President Trump’s administration may be forced to escalate its efforts—regardless of judicial pushback—to deliver the border security voters demanded.