The Trump administration’s push to tie federal grant money to bans on DEI and transgender-related programs has hit a legal wall, with a California judge ruling the orders likely violate the Constitution.
Key Facts:
- U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar ruled that President Trump’s executive orders cannot be enforced to restrict DEI or transgender-related programs from receiving federal grants.
- The ruling came after several LGBTQ organizations challenged the orders, arguing they suppress protected speech.
- Tigar wrote that the executive branch “cannot weaponize Congressionally appropriated funds” to suppress disfavored viewpoints.
- The plaintiffs include health centers and LGBTQ+ nonprofits like the San Francisco AIDS Foundation and the GLBT Historical Society.
- The court’s injunction remains in place while the legal challenge proceeds; an appeal is expected.
The Rest of The Story:
A coalition of LGBTQ organizations sued the Trump administration over executive orders they claim jeopardize their missions by threatening to pull funding from programs acknowledging transgender people or supporting DEI efforts.
Judge Jon Tigar sided with them, issuing a ruling that halts the enforcement of the orders during the ongoing litigation.
“These three funding provisions reflect an effort to censor constitutionally protected speech and services promoting DEI and recognizing the existence of transgender individuals,” Tigar wrote. He emphasized that while presidents can advance policy, they are still bound by constitutional limits.
Government attorneys argue that the executive has the right to control how federal dollars are spent, especially in line with the president’s priorities. But the plaintiffs contend this oversteps presidential authority and violates First Amendment protections.
BREAKING: Federal judge blocks Trump's "anti-DEI" and anti-trans funding orders, as applied to organizations that sued in a case led by San Francisco AIDS Foundation and filed in federal court in San Francisco.
Judge Jon Tigar (Obama)'s opinion: https://t.co/SK4DeoGKqH pic.twitter.com/K9mRRABlt4
— Chris “Law Dork” Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 9, 2025
Commentary:
This case is just the latest in a growing list of rulings where activist judges are openly working to undermine the Trump administration’s authority.
What we’re seeing here is a judge trying to micromanage federal executive decisions under the guise of constitutional interpretation.
The President has a mandate to reshape how federal funds are used, especially when it comes to rooting out taxpayer-funded left-wing ideology dressed up as “diversity.”
There’s nothing wrong with a president saying, “We won’t fund content that goes against the policies we were elected to carry out.”
If Congress didn’t like it, they could clarify the law. But instead, we have judges stepping in, freezing executive orders based on vague arguments about “protected speech.”
This isn’t about speech—it’s about federal dollars being used to prop up political agendas that voters rejected in 2016 and reaffirmed in 2020.
These DEI and gender ideology programs have gone far beyond tolerance—they demand ideological conformity.
The president has every right to say, “Not on the taxpayers’ dime.”
It’s also clear this ruling is a stall tactic.
Left-wing groups know they can’t win on the merits, so they run to courts hoping to delay enforcement until a new administration arrives.
This is political lawfare at its most transparent.
Ultimately, we expect this ruling to be reversed on appeal.
Even if it isn’t, Congress has a duty to get serious about defunding these programs entirely.
America’s taxpayers are not obligated to bankroll activism.
The Bottom Line:
A federal judge in California temporarily blocked the Trump administration from enforcing orders that tie funding to the removal of DEI and transgender-related content.
The ruling will likely be appealed and may not stand. But it’s part of a larger pattern—activist judges using procedural hurdles to block the president’s lawful agenda.
Congress should act decisively to ensure executive priorities are respected and federal funding reflects the values of American voters.
Read Next
– Texas Just Took Away A Major Perk Illegal Aliens Have Been Enjoying For Decades
– New Poll Shows Exactly What The American People Think Of Trump’s Deportation Program
– Crazed Dem Ripped For Insane Video Message Demanding ICE Leave Los Angeles Immediately
– Maxine Waters Spills the Beans, Demands LA Rioters Be Given Citizenship
– California Governor Newsom to Sue Trump Admin To Halt Deployment of National Guard in Los Angeles