A new ruling from the Ohio Supreme Court allows the state to enforce its ban on gender-altering treatments for minors while the case continues. The decision is a key victory for supporters of parental rights and medical safeguards.**
Key Facts:
- The Ohio Supreme Court ruled Tuesday to allow enforcement of House Bill 68, which bans puberty blockers and hormone treatments for minors.
- The decision came in response to a request from Attorney General Dave Yost, who sought a stay on a lower court’s ruling that had blocked the law.
- The 2023 law had been vetoed by Governor Mike DeWine but was reinstated by the legislature after overriding the veto.
- The ACLU of Ohio filed a lawsuit on behalf of two transgender minors, arguing the law violates the state constitution.
- The court’s decision means the law remains active while the legal case continues through the appeals process.
The Rest of The Story:
House Bill 68 was passed by the Ohio General Assembly to prohibit medical interventions such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy for minors.
Although the bill was vetoed by Republican Governor Mike DeWine, both the state House and Senate overrode the veto, allowing the law to take effect.
The law was quickly challenged in court by the ACLU of Ohio, which argued the measure violated constitutional protections.
In March, an appellate court temporarily blocked enforcement of the law.
However, on Tuesday, the Ohio Supreme Court reversed that stay, allowing the law to be enforced while litigation proceeds.
The court’s order was brief, issued by Chief Justice Sharon Kennedy and supported by Justice Pat Fischer.
Justice Jennifer Brunner, a Democrat, dissented.
The ACLU claims the law has already caused “tangible and irreparable harm” to minors in the state, accusing the court of enabling constitutional violations.
Meanwhile, the Ohio Attorney General’s Office maintains that the legislation is both legal and necessary to protect children from making life-altering decisions too early.
Commentary:
The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision is a win for common sense.
Allowing the law to remain in effect while legal questions are sorted out is not just a legal victory—it’s a moral one.
It sends a clear message that the state has a duty to protect children from irreversible medical procedures pushed by activist agendas.
This law doesn’t ban adults from making personal medical decisions.
It simply draws a line when it comes to minors who are not yet fully capable of grasping the long-term consequences of life-altering drugs and treatments.
That’s not discrimination—that’s child protection.
There is a reason society restricts certain decisions for minors—whether it’s alcohol, tattoos, or medical consent.
The idea that a 13-year-old should make permanent changes to their body without fully understanding the impact is irresponsible at best and abusive at worst.
The ACLU may scream about rights being denied, but what about the rights of children to grow up without being pressured into irreversible medical paths?
These are not “essential healthcare services”—they are experimental and often promoted without adequate long-term studies or safety assurances.
We applaud Attorney General Dave Yost for defending the law and standing up to extreme interpretations of constitutional rights.
And we’re grateful that the justices on the Ohio Supreme Court had the wisdom to uphold the law for now.
This ruling doesn’t end the legal fight, but it’s a sign that the court may ultimately side with those who believe kids deserve protection, not politicized medicine.
The Bottom Line:
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that the state can continue enforcing its ban on gender-related treatments for minors while the case is appealed.
It’s a decision grounded in protecting children from irreversible and often controversial medical procedures.
While legal challenges remain, the ruling suggests the court may ultimately support the law’s constitutionality.
Read Next
Democrat Congressman Introduces Seven Articles of Impeachment Against Trump
RFK Scores Major MAHA Victory, PepsiCo Rushes to Make Big Changes to its Products
Purse Thief Explains Why He Stole DHS Secretary Kristi Noem’s Hand Bag
DC Mayor Bowser Caught With Her Hands In The Cookie Jar, She Has Some Explaining To Do
DOJ’s Civil Rights Division Attorneys Resign En Masse Rather Than Enforce Trump Priorities