President Trump is prioritizing tariffs to boost U.S. manufacturing in sectors like defense and technology, rather than apparel. His goal: rebuild American strength by making critical products at home, not cheap imports abroad.
Key Facts:
- President Trump said his tariff policy is aimed at manufacturing military and tech products, not apparel.
- He supported Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s comment that the U.S. doesn’t need a booming textile industry.
- Trump pushed for a 50% tariff on EU goods, but extended the deadline to July 9 for further negotiations.
- The American Apparel & Footwear Association warned that tariffs would raise prices for consumers and hurt U.S. manufacturers.
- Trump emphasized domestic production of tanks, ships, AI technologies, chips, and computers over clothing items like socks or sneakers.
The Rest of The Story:
President Trump clarified on Sunday that his tariffs are designed to strengthen strategic manufacturing in the United States.
Speaking before boarding Air Force One, he dismissed the idea of revitalizing the U.S. textile industry, saying America should focus on producing “big things” like tanks, chips, and AI-related technologies.
His comments come after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent made similar remarks in April, drawing criticism from the textile industry.
Trump doubled down, explaining that the U.S. can manufacture items like T-shirts and socks elsewhere, but should prioritize high-value, defense-oriented products.
🚨 REPORTER: Secretary Scott Bessent has said we don't need to bring textile manufacturing back to the US.
TRUMP: "I tend to agree. We're not looking to make sneakers and T-shirts [here]… We want to make military equipment. We want to make big things. We want to make — the AI… pic.twitter.com/wGBt0TjgMr
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 25, 2025
Although Trump threatened a 50% tariff on EU goods by June 1, he later delayed that move until July 9 to allow more time for negotiations.
He also floated a 25% tax on imported iPhones, reflecting his broader strategy of using tariffs to incentivize companies to invest and build within the U.S.
Commentary:
President Trump’s approach cuts through the noise and addresses what really matters: national strength and independence.
His comments highlight the vital difference between strategic manufacturing and consumer goods.
It’s not about making T-shirts in America—it’s about making sure we can build tanks, warships, and semiconductor fabs when we need them.
We’re dangerously reliant on foreign nations for essential infrastructure, medicines, and high-tech components.
That dependency puts America at risk in any future crisis.
Globalist trade policies have hollowed out the U.S. industrial base.
We’ve been left with cheap goods, yes—but at the cost of security and resilience.
Trump is taking steps to correct that.
Critics from the apparel sector are worried about short-term costs, but they’re missing the bigger picture.
A 97% import rate for clothing shows how offshored and lopsided our economy has become.
That’s not strength—it’s vulnerability.
And while it may sound harsh, Trump’s comments about kids having “two dolls instead of 30” are a wake-up call.
Prioritizing abundance over autonomy is how we got here.
It’s time to flip that equation and rebuild the capacity to take care of our own needs.
Trump’s vision for rebuilding America isn’t about slogans—it’s about reindustrializing for the age of AI, cyberwarfare, and great power competition.
That means fewer cheap sneakers and more chip foundries.
When he delays tariffs, it’s not weakness—it’s strategy.
He’s giving partners one last chance to make a fair deal.
But when the time comes, he’s shown he’s ready to act.
The goal isn’t isolation—it’s preparation.
If we don’t make the big things, we lose our ability to lead, defend, and grow.
The Bottom Line:
Trump’s tariff strategy is about reshaping the American economy to prioritize defense, infrastructure, and tech—not cheap consumer goods.
His plan puts critical manufacturing back on U.S. soil, reducing dependence on foreign adversaries.
It’s a bold pivot—one aimed at national resilience over low-cost abundance.
America’s future strength may depend on it.
Read Next
– DNC Vice Chair Takes Heat For His Choice of Who The Leader of the Democratic Party Should Be
– Illegal Alien Caught Stealing $400,000 in Taxpayer Benefits, Voting in 2024 Election
– UK Considering Mandatory Chemical Castration For Sex Offenders