The United States is leaving UNESCO for the second time in under a decade, as President Trump reasserts his “America First” approach to international organizations. The administration says UNESCO has become a vehicle for divisive, anti-American and anti-Israel rhetoric that doesn’t reflect U.S. values or priorities.
Key Facts:
- The Trump administration announced the U.S. will withdraw from UNESCO.
- White House Deputy Spokesperson Anna Kelly said the move aligns with “America First” policies.
- The administration criticizes UNESCO for pushing “woke, divisive” globalist agendas.
- The U.S. previously left UNESCO in 2017 under Trump but rejoined under President Biden in 2023.
- UNESCO’s recognition of the “State of Palestine” remains a core issue for the U.S. withdrawal.
The Rest of The Story:
President Trump is once again pulling the United States out of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
The move, announced Tuesday, marks the second U.S. departure from the agency under Trump’s leadership.
White House Deputy Spokesperson Anna Kelly issued a statement saying, “President Donald Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from UNESCO – which supports woke, divisive cultural and social causes that are totally out-of-step with the commonsense policies that Americans voted for in November.”
The administration claims that UNESCO has increasingly promoted a globalist agenda under the banner of the U.N.’s Sustainable Development Goals, which they say run counter to the U.S.’s national interests.
The Trump administration also objects to UNESCO’s decision to admit “Palestine” as a member state—a decision they argue contradicts longstanding U.S. policy and encourages anti-Israel sentiment.
State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce echoed that reasoning, stating that “continued involvement with UNESCO is not in the national interest of the United States.”
The decision follows a broader Trump administration strategy of challenging U.N. agencies viewed as hostile to U.S. values and allies, particularly Israel.
Secretary-General António Guterres criticized recent U.S. foreign aid cuts, warning they would hurt the world’s most vulnerable populations.
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump WITHDRAWS the US from of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) over its DEI policies, and pro-China, pro-Palestine bias – NYP pic.twitter.com/tx8zzEU3IL
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) July 22, 2025
Commentary:
President Trump’s decision to exit UNESCO for a second time reinforces a much-needed course correction in how the U.S. engages with international bodies.
For too long, agencies like UNESCO have drifted away from their original purpose and now serve as echo chambers for globalist, anti-American narratives—often funded by American taxpayers.
UNESCO’s recognition of “Palestine” as a member state is a serious red flag.
That decision alone legitimizes anti-Israel efforts and undermines decades of U.S. foreign policy that supported direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.
It’s not America’s job to bankroll an organization that promotes agendas contrary to our own interests and those of our closest allies.
The Trump administration’s rejection of UNESCO’s “Sustainable Development Goals” is also significant.
These goals push environmental and social engineering policies that have nothing to do with UNESCO’s founding mission.
Instead, they advance ideologies more aligned with European-style governance than American constitutional values.
Critics may argue that leaving undermines diplomacy.But engagement should not mean submission to biased institutions.
The U.S. can and should remain a global leader—on our terms, not those dictated by bureaucrats who oppose American values and routinely criticize our country and allies.
President Biden’s decision to rejoin UNESCO in 2023 showed a willingness to reinvest in broken institutions for the sake of optics.
That decision didn’t lead to reform or reconciliation—it simply restored funding to an agency that refuses to correct its course.
By withdrawing again, President Trump is sending a message: American sovereignty is not up for negotiation, and our alliances and global involvement must serve our people—not some ideological blueprint dreamed up in a boardroom in Paris.
It’s a prudent move. The U.N. needs to know that if it wants American dollars and support, it must show respect for American values and allies.
Until then, less is more when it comes to U.S. involvement.
The Bottom Line:
President Trump has once again taken a stand against international organizations that no longer serve America’s interests.
By exiting UNESCO, the U.S. is refusing to fund anti-Israel rhetoric and globalist agendas with taxpayer dollars.
This decision reinforces a broader strategy to prioritize national sovereignty over global bureaucracy.
Read Next
Slimy Self Serving GOP Rep Abruptly Resigns From Congress, GOP House Majority Shrinks Further
House Speaker Johnson Sends Congress on Recess Early Over Epstein Votes
Why Are Legacy Media Outlets So Silent About Gabbards Explosive Russia Collusion Hoax Claims?
Cracker Barrel Gets Hit With Legal Complaint Over Its DEI Based Hiring Programs