A federal judge has rejected Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan’s motion to dismiss her criminal case for allegedly helping an illegal alien avoid ICE. Caught on camera, Dugan argued judicial immunity and invoked a Trump-era Supreme Court ruling—but the court wasn’t buying it.
Key Facts:
- Judge Hannah Dugan was indicted in May for obstruction and helping Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, an illegal immigrant, avoid arrest.
- Her defense hinged on judicial immunity and the 10th Amendment, citing the Trump v. United States decision.
- U.S. Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph recommended denying Dugan’s motion to dismiss the charges.
- Joseph ruled that judicial immunity doesn’t apply to criminal prosecution.
- The final decision now lies with U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman, a Clinton appointee.
The Rest of The Story:
Judge Hannah Dugan faces federal charges for allegedly helping an illegal immigrant, Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, evade U.S. immigration authorities after a court hearing in April.
Flores-Ruiz had been charged with three misdemeanor battery counts.
The incident was reportedly caught on courthouse surveillance cameras.
Dugan’s legal team tried to dismiss the case by invoking judicial immunity and the 10th Amendment, arguing that her conduct was protected as part of her official duties.
Her lawyers also cited the recent Supreme Court ruling in Trump v. United States to claim immunity from prosecution.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph rejected those claims outright.
In her recommendation to the court, she wrote: “Does judicial immunity shield Dugan from prosecution because the indictment alleges she violated federal criminal law while performing judicial duties? The answer is no.”
Commentary:
Dugan’s defense is a textbook case of judicial arrogance.
She was caught on video helping an illegal alien walk free.
The idea that she could use her robe as a shield from prosecution is offensive to the rule of law.
This wasn’t a vague or ambiguous moment in the courtroom—it was a clear and deliberate act to thwart immigration enforcement.
That’s not “judicial discretion,” that’s aiding and abetting.
By comparing herself to a sitting president, Dugan overplayed her hand.
The Supreme Court’s ruling on Trump’s immunity doesn’t apply to rogue judges bending the rules in local courtrooms.
Her lawyers’ attempt to twist that ruling into a get-out-of-jail-free card failed miserably.
This case is bigger than just one judge. It sends a message to all public officials who think they’re untouchable.
It shows that the justice system—under President Trump—is willing to hold even judges accountable when they break the law.
The fact that Judge Joseph dismissed every single argument Dugan raised should be a wake-up call.
The court didn’t leave any wiggle room. There’s no legal cover for what Dugan did, and no political spin will change that.
It’s also a strong moment for judicial accountability.
For too long, some judges have acted like they’re above scrutiny.
This ruling reminds them that the law applies to everyone—no matter the title.
This is a major win for the Trump administration’s push to restore order and integrity in the judiciary.
It’s proof that under this leadership, lawlessness will be met with consequences—even for judges.
The Bottom Line:
Judge Hannah Dugan’s effort to dodge federal charges has failed, at least for now.
A magistrate judge has made clear that judicial immunity doesn’t protect criminal behavior.
The case now moves forward under Judge Lynn Adelman, but Dugan’s arguments have already been dismantled.
Her trial may have been delayed, but accountability is on the horizon.
Read Next
– Trump Admin Sets Its Sights on the Smithsonian For Pushing Divisive Political Narratives
– Illegal Immigrants Facing Massive New Financial Penalties For Refusing to Self-Deport
– Trump Signs Two Executive Orders Prioritizing US Residents Over Foreign Tourists At National Parks
– 144 EPA Officials Put on Immediate Leave After Signing Letter Slamming Trump Administration Policies
– OpenAI Chief Altman SLAMS Democratic Party For Turning Against Capitalism, ‘Politically Homeless’
