A fierce battle is brewing in San Diego over a new “super sanctuary” policy that Tom Homan vows to stop at any cost.
Key Facts:
– The San Diego County Board of Supervisors passed the policy in a 3-1 vote.
– Local law enforcement must now secure a warrant before contacting ICE about an illegal migrant who is arrested.
– Former ICE Acting Director Tom Homan called the new resolution “10 times worse” than California’s prior sanctuary law.
– Sheriff Kelly Martinez openly opposes the measure and has said she will not comply.
– San Diego has recently seen a surge in border crossings, attributed partly to stricter enforcement in Texas.
The Rest of The Story:
This “super sanctuary” policy extends existing protections for illegal migrants, even those arrested for crimes, by barring local officers from notifying federal authorities without a judge’s approval.
Homan, set to oversee border enforcement, insists he will move against any local official who blocks cooperation with ICE, noting that public safety is at stake.
In a striking statement, San Diego County Sheriff Martinez said she would refuse to enforce the resolution, pointing out the need to protect crime victims of all backgrounds.
The lone opposing vote on the Board, Jim Desmond, has already reached out to the incoming administration, describing the resolution as “disastrous.”
Meanwhile, border officials say San Diego has become the top region for illegal entries on the southern border, in part due to stricter measures elsewhere and the state’s broader sanctuary policies.
Today’s outrageous decision to turn San Diego County into a “Super” Sanctuary County is an affront to every law-abiding citizen who values safety and justice. The Board of Supervisors’ 3-1 vote to embrace this radical policy is a direct betrayal of the people we are sworn to… pic.twitter.com/LypCR5S1GX
— Supervisor Jim Desmond (@jim_desmond) December 10, 2024
Commentary:
San Diego County’s new policy flirts with outright illegality.
Federal immigration law has long taken priority over state and local rules, meaning such a move could face immediate legal challenges.
If the County insists on defying federal standards, Washington should suspend all funding until compliance is restored.
Moreover, those responsible for adopting a measure that shelters individuals with active criminal charges should face possible prosecution to the fullest extent of federal law.
When local decisions jeopardize national security, the federal government must respond firmly.
The Bottom Line:
The new “super sanctuary” law in San Diego has triggered a serious conflict between federal and local authorities.
READ NEXT: Church of England Ask Priests to Remove Phrases From Christmas Carols to Avoid Offending Others
As tensions rise, the fate of this policy could reshape how immigration laws are enforced nationwide.