UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer threatens to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN if Israel doesn’t meet specific demands by September. His position aligns with France and has sparked backlash from Israel and U.S. officials.
Key Facts:
- UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Tuesday that Britain may recognize “Palestine” at the UN in September if Israel does not meet certain demands.
- Starmer’s conditions include a ceasefire in Gaza, a commitment to peace, and ending annexations in the West Bank.
- Israel’s UN Ambassador Danny Danon rejected the pressure, saying Hamas has refused past ceasefires and Israel will continue its mission to defeat terrorism.
- President Trump disputed Starmer’s account, saying no such recognition plan was discussed in their meeting.
- France has already announced its intent to recognize a Palestinian state unconditionally this September, prompting backlash from Israel and U.S. officials.
The Rest of The Story:
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer told reporters on Tuesday that his government will assess in September whether Israel has met certain conditions related to Gaza and peace negotiations.
If not, the UK will push to recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations.
Starmer listed demands such as ending the “appalling situation in Gaza,” agreeing to a ceasefire, allowing U.N. aid, and reviving the two-state process.
He made clear that no other country should have “a veto” over Britain’s decision.
My statement on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and our plan for peace including the recognition of a Palestinian State. pic.twitter.com/aMUCNwJb9z
— Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) July 29, 2025
Israel’s U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon pushed back strongly, saying, “Israel has already agreed many times to a ceasefire,” adding, “No virtual recognition and no U.N. decision will change the basic fact that there are those who fight extremist forces, and there are those who bow their heads and ignore them.”
Starmer claimed he had discussed Gaza aid and his position with President Trump, who later denied that recognition of a Palestinian state came up.
Trump criticized the idea as rewarding Hamas.
Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron has already committed to recognizing Palestine this fall, a move sharply condemned by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Commentary:
Starmer’s announcement is not just misguided—it’s dangerous.
He’s attempting to strong-arm Israel into a ceasefire with Hamas, a terrorist group that started this war with the brutal attacks of October 7.
No amount of diplomatic theater at the U.N. changes the fact that Hamas continues to hold innocent hostages while using civilians as shields.
What Starmer and Macron are proposing would reward terrorism.
Recognizing a Palestinian state under the current conditions is not a step toward peace.
It legitimizes a barbaric regime that has never once shown it desires peace.
It also undermines Israel’s sovereign right to defend itself and determine its own future.
This one-sided pressure completely ignores the hostage imbalance.
For every Israeli hostage released—if any—Hamas gets back hundreds of convicted prisoners.
Meanwhile, the world barely acknowledges the brutality of October 7.
Starmer isn’t calling for Hamas to lay down arms or release hostages; he’s only targeting Israel.
The fact that Macron’s France is already committed to recognition without conditions is bad enough.
But for the UK to follow suit if Israel doesn’t comply with an outside nation’s demands is blackmail in all but name.
This isn’t diplomacy—it’s coercion.
Israel is under no obligation to yield its sovereignty to foreign leaders or the U.N.
These moves embolden Hamas, weaken Western resolve, and place the burden of peace on the only democracy in the region.
If anything, this tilt toward Hamas will delay peace, not promote it.
The Bottom Line:
The UK’s threat to recognize a Palestinian state if Israel doesn’t comply with its demands by September sets a troubling precedent.
It hands leverage to Hamas and punishes Israel for defending itself against terrorism.
Sovereign nations should never be blackmailed into policy decisions by foreign powers or the United Nations.
Read Next
– Trump and EU Seal Surprise Deal After Last-Minute Talks
– Trump Slams Kamala, Celebs Over Alleged Pay-For-Play Endorsements, ‘They Should All Be Prosecuted’
– New Poll Shows Democrat Favorability Hits 35 Year Low, GOP Gains on Key Issues