Co-hosts on The View debated whether America is too sexist to elect a female president after the losses of Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris. While some claimed misogyny was the core issue, others on the panel pointed to the flaws of the candidates themselves.
Key Facts:
- Sunny Hostin called the U.S. a “misogynistic country” because it hasn’t elected a female president.
- Rep. Jasmine Crockett expressed concern that Democrats may avoid nominating another woman after Clinton and Harris’s defeats.
- Co-host Sara Haines argued voters rejected the individual candidates, not their gender.
- Alyssa Farah Griffin stated sexism was not the key factor in Harris’s 2024 loss.
- President Biden blamed sexism for Harris’s defeat in a recent appearance on *The View*.
The Rest of The Story:
The debate started after Rep. Jasmine Crockett suggested Democrats might avoid nominating another woman for president due to previous election losses.
This prompted the hosts of The View to weigh in on why Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris failed in their presidential bids.
Sunny Hostin claimed the country is fundamentally sexist, pointing out that many developed nations have had female leaders, unlike the U.S.
She argued Clinton was among the most qualified candidates in history and lost because her husband’s past was weaponized against her.
Others disagreed.
Sara Haines argued voters made individual decisions based on who the candidates were, not their gender.
Alyssa Farah Griffin emphasized that while sexism and racism exist, they weren’t the decisive reasons Harris lost in 2024.
President Biden, in his own interview on the show, said sexism played a major role in her defeat, particularly due to her race and gender.
The View’s Sunny Hostin could NOT handle it when Sara Haines said that Hillary Clinton lost to Trump in 2016 for reasons NOT related to her gender.
HAINES: "Is there no distinguishing factors to each woman and why they might've lost? Is there no nuance?"
Leave it to Sunny… pic.twitter.com/cESnyRlaLB
— Brandon Tatum (@TheOfficerTatum) May 15, 2025
Commentary:
The conversation on The View reflects a troubling disconnect between reality and ideology.
The suggestion that the U.S. is inherently misogynistic because it hasn’t elected a female president ignores the actual choices voters had—and rejected.
It wasn’t America’s sexism that defeated Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris.
It was their failure to inspire confidence.
Clinton was never popular outside her political base.
Her campaign was weighed down by scandal, entitlement, and a perception of corruption.
Many Americans simply didn’t trust her, and rightly so.
Her dismissive tone, especially calling Trump supporters “deplorables,” alienated millions.
As for Kamala Harris, she never resonated with voters.
She dropped out of the 2020 Democratic primary before her own state had the chance to reject her.
Once in office, she became almost invisible.
She avoided tough interviews, offered no clear agenda, and was widely criticized for her communication failures.
She was not qualified by performance—only by position.
Claiming sexism as the reason for these failures is a lazy excuse.
It spares the Democratic Party and its base from confronting the truth: these candidates weren’t liked or trusted.
Americans want strong leadership, not identity box-checking.
There is nothing inherently wrong with a woman being president.
The problem is with pushing unqualified candidates simply because of their gender.
That mindset is more insulting to women than anything else.
It suggests that women can’t win on merit—only through guilt or symbolic progress.
The Bottom Line:
The women on The View want to blame sexism for political failures instead of facing the reality that Clinton and Harris were flawed candidates.
American voters aren’t rejecting women—they’re rejecting weak leaders.
When a strong, qualified woman runs, she will have a real shot.
But until then, blaming the country is not just wrong—it’s dishonest.
Read Next
– Researchers Using Ground Penetrating Radar Believe They May Have Found Noah’s Ark
– Border Patrol Applications Surge to Highest Level in The Agency’s History
– Patel Issues Blunt Warning After ISIS Plot to Hit Michigan Army Facility Foiled