President Trump can now move forward with a sweeping plan to reduce the size of the federal workforce after a 8-1 Supreme Court ruling cleared the way for job cuts across multiple agencies.
Key Facts:
- The Supreme Court ruled 8-1 to allow enforcement of President Trump’s executive order downsizing federal agencies.
- Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the lone dissenter, calling the order “legally dubious.”
- At least 75,000 federal employees have already taken deferred resignations or been placed on leave.
- The Department of Government Efficiency, briefly led by Elon Musk, is overseeing the effort.
- Lower court rulings had blocked the cuts until the Supreme Court intervened.
The Rest of The Story:
The Supreme Court issued an unsigned order allowing President Trump’s administration to proceed with federal job reductions, lifting previous blocks set by lower courts.
These cuts stem from an executive order Trump signed in February, directing federal agencies to reduce staffing levels.
The program is spearheaded by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which was led for a time by billionaire Elon Musk before his departure.
Trump has said these efforts are part of fulfilling a voter mandate to streamline the federal government.
Lower courts had previously ruled that the administration’s actions lacked congressional authorization.
U.S. District Judge Susan Illston—appointed by President Clinton—found that major reductions to the federal workforce require legislative approval.
The Ninth Circuit upheld her ruling by a 2-1 vote, citing potential harm to services like veterans’ healthcare and food safety.
Justice Jackson, the only dissent on the Supreme Court, strongly criticized the decision, writing that the court was too eager to back the president’s “legally dubious actions in an emergency posture.”
Labor unions and nonprofit groups warned the justices that agencies could face staff cuts of 40% to 50%.
Agencies impacted by the order include the Departments of Agriculture, Energy, Labor, Interior, State, Treasury, and Veterans Affairs, as well as the EPA, Social Security Administration, and Small Business Administration.
🚨 BREAKING – VICTORY: The US Supreme Court GREENLIGHTS President Trump’s major federal workforce cuts in 19 departments
8-1
Guess who dissented?
Ketanji Jackson. pic.twitter.com/zlYnqLcvwq
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) July 8, 2025
Commentary:
The Court’s 8-1 ruling is a major win for those who believe in a streamlined, accountable federal government.
The Constitution clearly places the executive branch under the authority of the president, and that includes staffing decisions. This ruling affirms that authority.
If a president cannot manage the size and scope of the bureaucracy under his direction, then the presidency becomes a ceremonial role rather than an executive one.
Trump’s administration has made clear that it intends to return power to elected officials rather than unelected bureaucrats. The Court has now agreed.
For the second time in two weeks, a Supreme Court justice is using her opinion to scold Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson for not understanding what she is talking about.
Twist: This time, it's progressive Justice SONIA SOTOMAYOR doing it, patiently explaining that the Court can't… pic.twitter.com/3POzNEQXOU
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) July 8, 2025
The reaction from labor unions and political opponents was expected.
Any attempt to rein in the federal workforce is met with panic and predictions of doom.
But the American people are tired of bloated government and sluggish service.
A leaner workforce may deliver better results at lower cost.
While critics fear cuts in services, much of the federal bureaucracy has grown far beyond its original scope.
Agencies with vague or overlapping missions often waste time and resources.
This ruling enables the administration to assess and remove inefficiencies.
It’s also worth noting that this decision wasn’t narrowly partisan.
A 8-1 majority reflects broad legal agreement—even among justices with differing political leanings—that the president has this authority.
Government should work for the people, not for the protection of jobs in a sprawling federal apparatus.
Taxpayers deserve to see their money spent wisely, not funneled into departments with little oversight or accountability.
By supporting this ruling, the Supreme Court sends a clear message: the president is the boss of the executive branch.
That clarity is essential in a system of checks and balances.
The Bottom Line:
The Supreme Court’s decision allows President Trump to move forward with his plan to cut federal jobs and shrink the size of government.
It reaffirms the president’s authority to oversee executive branch staffing decisions.
This is a win for constitutional governance, taxpayers, and the push for a more efficient federal workforce.
Read Next
– Trump Admin Sets Its Sights on the Smithsonian For Pushing Divisive Political Narratives
– Illegal Immigrants Facing Massive New Financial Penalties For Refusing to Self-Deport
– Trump Signs Two Executive Orders Prioritizing US Residents Over Foreign Tourists At National Parks
– 144 EPA Officials Put on Immediate Leave After Signing Letter Slamming Trump Administration Policies
– OpenAI Chief Altman SLAMS Democratic Party For Turning Against Capitalism, ‘Politically Homeless’
