A Republican lawmaker in Maine just won a major First Amendment victory at the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court ruled 7-2 that the Maine legislature’s censure of Rep. Laurel Libby over a post about a transgender athlete was unconstitutional.
Key Facts:
- Rep. Laurel Libby was censured on February 15 by the Maine House for a social media post naming a transgender athlete who won a girls’ pole vault competition.
- The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that the censure must be revoked, calling Libby’s right to relief “indisputably clear.”
- Libby’s post shared already public information and drew no objections from the athlete’s family or school at the time.
- Maine House Speaker Ryan Fecteau demanded an apology in exchange for lifting the censure; Libby refused and sued instead.
- Libby lost in lower courts but persisted to the Supreme Court, which sided with her despite dissents from Justices Sotomayor and Jackson.
The Rest of The Story:
Rep. Libby came under fire earlier this year after posting about a transgender athlete competing in a girls’ sporting event.
Although the information was already public, Democratic leaders in Maine’s legislature took issue with her post, claiming it endangered a minor and violated “long-held political traditions.”
When she refused to delete the post or apologize, Speaker Fecteau and other Democrats pushed through a censure that stripped Libby of her voting rights in the House.
Maine Democrats just censured Rep. Laurel Libby and stripped her of voting rights in the Maine House because she defended women and girls.
INSANE pic.twitter.com/OKgOf8zpk2
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 26, 2025
Libby responded by suing, arguing her constitutional rights were violated.
After losses in district and appeals courts, Libby took her fight to the Supreme Court, where a majority ruled firmly in her favor.
The ruling reinstates her ability to vote and participate in floor debates.
It also sends a clear signal to state legislatures across the country: elected officials cannot be punished for speaking out on matters of public interest, especially when the speech is truthful and constitutionally protected.
🚨 VICTORY!🚨
The U.S. Supreme Court just restored the voice of 9,000 Mainers!
After 2+ months of being silenced for speaking up for Maine girls, I can once again vote on behalf of the people of House District 90.
This is a win for free speech — and for the Constitution. 🇺🇸
— Rep. Laurel Libby (@laurel_libby) May 20, 2025
Commentary:
This case is a clear example of what happens when elected Democrats push a radical agenda without regard for constitutional limits.
The Maine legislature tried to bully Rep. Libby into silence for stating a truth that many Americans still believe: biological males do not belong in girls’ sports.
It’s not hateful.
It’s common sense.
Rather than engage in open debate, the Maine House punished Libby by stripping her ability to vote and represent her constituents.
That alone should alarm every citizen who values free speech and representative government.
When elected officials are silenced, so are the voices of those who voted for them.
Libby didn’t share private or hidden information—she merely commented on something already widely circulated.
Her refusal to apologize was not stubbornness; it was principle.
Democrats in the House weren’t concerned about the athlete’s safety. They were concerned about losing control of the narrative.
Even more telling is how Governor Janet Mills and House Speaker Fecteau stood by this decision until the bitter end.
They refused to back down, even as support grew nationally for Libby.
And the dissenting opinions from Justices Sotomayor and Jackson didn’t challenge the merits of Libby’s case—they just didn’t want the Supreme Court to intervene so quickly.
Libby’s victory should be a wake-up call to lawmakers who think they can use political muscle to silence dissent.
The Constitution is not optional, and the courts have shown they will act when state houses go too far.
The Bottom Line:
Rep. Laurel Libby stood her ground and took her case all the way to the Supreme Court—and won.
The Court’s decision protects not just her voice, but the voices of all elected officials who dare to challenge progressive orthodoxy.
In Maine and across the country, lawmakers should take note: censorship is not governance. It’s tyranny.
Read Next
Researchers Using Ground Penetrating Radar Believe They May Have Found Noah’s Ark
Rep Nancy Mace Confronts the Man Who Vowed to Kill Her: ‘He’s Twice My Size. It Was Scary’
New Pope Sets Clear Tone on Marriage, Immigration, and the Church’s Future