A controversial leak of Signal messages involving senior Trump officials has escalated after The Atlantic published what it claims are “attack plans” for airstrikes against Houthi targets in Yemen.
Key Facts:
- The Atlantic published Signal texts it described as U.S. “attack plans” involving Houthi targets in Yemen.
- The texts came from a group chat including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, and Vice President JD Vance.
- Editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally added to the group and later published parts of the chat.
- Trump officials, including Hegseth and Tulsi Gabbard, insist the texts did not include classified information or war plans.
- Congressional Democrats have called for Hegseth’s removal, citing national security risks from the leak.
The Rest of The Story:
The Atlantic released a series of Signal messages on Wednesday that it claims show coordination and timing of U.S. military strikes on Houthi rebel targets.
These messages, involving senior officials in the Trump administration, outlined a minute-by-minute sequence of operations including F-18 and drone launches.
The texts were reportedly shared in a private chat that mistakenly included Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg.
The outlet justified publishing the messages, saying it was in the public interest due to their “nonsecure” nature.
It argued that officials were downplaying the seriousness of what was discussed.
However, key administration figures, including Secretary Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, denied that any classified material was included.
Hegseth told reporters, “Nobody’s texting war plans,” and stood by the success of the missions.
After dispute over whether Defense Secretary Hegseth posted classified information on Signal group text, Atlantic publishes what it says is the 'war plan' Hegseth posted on text shortly before 3/15/25 attack on Houthis. https://t.co/9fQcOPAPP6 pic.twitter.com/sxqoKVxzz6
— Byron York (@ByronYork) March 26, 2025
Commentary:
Publishing military movement details, even if not formally classified, is reckless.
The Atlantic may claim “public interest,” but the real cost could have been paid in American lives.
Military actions are high-risk and time-sensitive—disclosing launch times and strike targets, no matter how “casual” the format, could easily compromise mission safety.
The editors involved in this decision didn’t just stumble onto sensitive information; they actively chose to broadcast it.
And they did so knowing full well that, had these messages landed in enemy hands, the consequences could have been fatal for U.S. pilots and personnel.
The Atlantic has conceded: these were NOT “war plans.”
This entire story was another hoax written by a Trump-hater who is well-known for his sensationalist spin. pic.twitter.com/atGrDd2ymr
— Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) March 26, 2025
Despite their efforts to spin it as transparency, the timing and intent here are clear.
With a hostile view toward the Trump administration, The Atlantic seems more focused on embarrassing officials than protecting U.S. national security.
This isn’t journalism—it’s sabotage dressed up as reporting.
Responsible media outlets weigh the value of publication against potential harm.
That basic principle appears to have been ignored in favor of political gain.
We should expect accountability from our press, just as we do from our military.
If federal laws were violated, we hope the Department of Justice holds The Atlantic’s editors to the same standard as anyone else leaking national security information.
The Bottom Line:
This story raises serious questions about journalistic ethics and national security.
The Atlantic took a gamble by releasing sensitive military information and framed it as public interest.
But if there’s evidence of reckless disclosure of protected information, the DOJ must act swiftly.
National defense should never be treated like political theater.
Read Next
– Rep Jasmine Crockett Gets Terrible News After Mocking Greg Abbott as ‘Governor Hot Wheels’
– Dirty Little Secret About The AOC-Bernie Sanders Rally Just Got Revealed, It Was All a Fraud
– New Dirt on Trump Nemesis Judge Boasberg Raises Even More Questions