A “60 Minutes” interview with Kamala Harris—at the center of Trump’s \$20 billion lawsuit against CBS—is now nominated for an Emmy, raising eyebrows over media bias and timing.
Key Facts:
- The Harris-Walz interview from “60 Minutes” is nominated for an Emmy in the Outstanding Edited Interview category.
- President Trump filed a $10 billion lawsuit, now raised to $20 billion, against CBS and Paramount for alleged election interference.
- The lawsuit accuses CBS of editing Harris’ “word salad” response to protect her image before the election.
- The FCC is investigating the network for possible violation of news distortion rules and demanded the full transcript.
- Paramount is reportedly considering a settlement to ease its planned merger with Skydance Media.
The Rest of The Story:
CBS’ “60 Minutes” program received an Emmy nomination for its interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, which aired during the 2020 campaign season.
The recognition arrives amid an ongoing legal battle between President Trump and CBS’ parent company, Paramount Global, over the interview’s editing.
The dispute stems from how CBS aired Harris’ response to a question about Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu.
Critics claim CBS selectively edited Harris’ response to make her appear more coherent in the primetime airing, while preview clips circulated a disjointed version.
Trump alleges this amounted to election interference.
Adding fuel to the fire, CBS initially refused to release the full unedited footage.
The FCC stepped in, demanding transparency after a complaint was filed.
The released footage confirmed that CBS aired different parts of the same response in separate segments.
Meanwhile, CBS executive producer Bill Owens resigned, citing editorial pressure, and Paramount is now reportedly pushing for a settlement to avoid regulatory fallout before a potential merger.
ELECTION INTERFERENCE: 60 Minutes deceived the American people in an attempt to change the outcome of the 2024 election. Their deceptive editing of Kamala Harris' interview prompted Trump to sue the network for $20 billion – they have decided to settle instead of facing the… https://t.co/Wx0Ft7iPd1
— @amuse (@amuse) April 30, 2025
Commentary:
Only in today’s media landscape can a story this absurd be true.
An interview so controversial that it triggered a \$20 billion lawsuit for alleged election interference is now up for an Emmy—for editing, no less.
You can’t make this up.
The Kamala Harris “60 Minutes” debacle showed what many Americans already suspect: the media isn’t just playing favorites—they’re rigging the game.
Editing Harris’ rambling, incoherent answer into something remotely presidential was such a creative task that it earned them an award nomination.
That alone would be comedy gold if the implications weren’t so serious.
The real punchline? Paramount is considering settling the lawsuit.
A \$20 billion payout is on the table because the editing was so “good” it crossed legal lines.
That tells you everything about how powerful media giants manipulate narratives for political gain.
This isn’t journalism—it’s campaign management.
What’s worse is how the industry is responding.
CBS insiders are reportedly scared—not because they did something wrong, but because the lawsuit might hurt their image.
That tells you everything.
Accountability isn’t their concern.
Optics are.
Meanwhile, the FCC’s involvement indicates this is more than a political spat.
The chair demanding unedited transcripts suggests there’s real substance to the claims of distortion.
But instead of owning it, the network pretends this is all just political theater.
If this is what earns an Emmy in today’s media world, then maybe the entire awards process is as rigged as the coverage itself.
The media could fix all of this by returning to basic honesty, but apparently, that’s too much to ask.
The Bottom Line:
CBS’ “60 Minutes” received an Emmy nomination for a highly edited Kamala Harris interview that now sits at the center of a \$20 billion lawsuit from President Trump.
The network faces scrutiny not just for its editorial choices but for possible FCC violations.
As CBS scrambles to manage internal fallout and a potential merger, the nomination feels like a surreal reward for what critics call deliberate manipulation.
In today’s media climate, truth seems to come second to spin—and that’s the real scandal.
Read Next
– Judge Frees Man Who Fire Bombed A Tesla Dealership To Receive ‘Gender Affirming Care’
– Patel and Bongino Start to Clean House, Kneeling Agents in Iconic George Floyd Photo Get Bad News
– Deportation Flight Leaves U.S.—But This Time, Another Country Paid For It
– A Federal Judge Just Issued an INSANE Order Designed to Block The Border Patrol From Doing Its Job