Trump’s Iran Strategy: Squeeze the Oil Industry, Force a Reckoning
The Trump administration is ramping up sanctions against Iran in a bid to cripple its oil industry and weaken its economy. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent outlined the aggressive approach, which aims to cut Iran’s oil exports and financial ties to the global economy.
Key Facts:
- Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said U.S. sanctions are designed for “immediate maximum impact” on Iran.
- The goal is to slash Iran’s oil exports from 1.5 million barrels per day to almost nothing.
- The administration also seeks to cripple Tehran’s drone manufacturing and financial access.
- Oil prices initially rose following Bessent’s remarks, with Brent crude reaching $69.46 per barrel.
- Trump reimposed his pressure campaign through a Feb. 4 presidential memorandum, with sanctions hitting an international network shipping Iranian oil to China by Feb. 6.
The Rest of The Story:
The latest sanctions represent a continuation of Trump’s “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran.
By targeting oil exports—the country’s primary revenue source—the administration hopes to weaken the Iranian regime’s ability to fund its military and regional influence.
Bessent warned that Iran’s economy is already struggling and that further restrictions could accelerate its collapse.
The administration is also working to isolate Iran from the global financial system.
He bluntly advised Iranians to move their wealth out of the local currency before it deteriorates further.
Trump has stated that while he prefers a diplomatic resolution, he is willing to exert significant economic force.
He withdrew the U.S. from the Obama-era nuclear deal in 2018, arguing it was ineffective.
Despite the tough stance, Trump has suggested he is open to a new agreement that verifiably ensures Iran does not develop nuclear weapons.
🔥“Making Iran broke again” is the aim of the Trump Administration, Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent tells the NY Economic Club. “We will close off Iran’s access to the international financial system… We are going to shut down Iran’s oil sector and drone manufacturing… If I were an… pic.twitter.com/mV9fl1XKkb
— Miranda Devine (@mirandadevine) March 6, 2025
Commentary:
For years, both the Obama and Biden administrations operated under the illusion that engaging with Iran would lead to moderation.
That theory has been proven disastrously wrong.
Tehran has continued its aggressive behavior, funding terrorist groups, developing weapons, and threatening regional stability.
The Iranian regime has shown time and again that it responds only to force, not diplomacy.
Trump’s strategy of cutting off Iran’s oil revenue is the most effective way to apply pressure.
Iran’s leaders depend on oil exports to sustain their power and military ambitions.
Strangling that cash flow forces them to make hard choices—either comply with international demands or face economic ruin.
Some critics warn that sanctions could drive up oil prices in the short term.
That’s a fair concern, but in the long run, a weakened Iran means a more stable Middle East.
That stability will ultimately bring energy prices down as the threat of conflict diminishes.
If the U.S. wants real change in Iran, it must stay the course.
Maximum pressure has a proven track record, and it’s the best shot at either forcing the regime to reform or hastening its downfall.
Iran has pushed back against diplomacy for too long.
It’s time for America to make clear that bad behavior has consequences.
The Bottom Line:
Trump’s economic pressure campaign against Iran is a direct response to years of failed engagement policies.
By targeting Iran’s oil sector and financial system, the administration aims to force a reckoning in Tehran.
Short-term effects on energy prices are possible, but in the long run, a more stable Middle East will benefit global markets.
The U.S. must remain firm—maximum pressure is the best chance to curb Iran’s ambitions.
Read Next
– Mike Johnson’s Top Aide Was Arrested by Capitol Police Following Trump’s Speech
– Federal Appeals Court Makes Decision in Case Involving Limits of Executive Authority