The Justice Department has launched a formal investigation into the State of Minnesota’s hiring practices, targeting a policy that may penalize managers for selecting white or male applicants.
This move comes amid ongoing clashes between the Biden-aligned state government and federal civil rights enforcement under the Trump administration.
Key Facts:
- The DOJ is investigating whether Minnesota’s hiring practices violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
- A new state policy pressures supervisors to justify hiring non-“underrepresented” applicants or face discipline.
- The Minnesota DHS policy defines “underrepresented” as women and various racial minority groups.
- AG Pamela Bondi and DOJ Civil Rights head Harmeet Dhillon called the policy discriminatory and illegal.
- This follows DOJ action in June against Minnesota’s in-state tuition benefits for illegal immigrants.
The Rest of The Story:
The U.S. Department of Justice is formally investigating the State of Minnesota to determine if its hiring practices within the Department of Human Services (DHS) violate federal anti-discrimination laws.
At issue is a new policy that requires supervisors to provide written justification for hiring white or male candidates in positions deemed “underrepresented.”
The policy targets job categories where minorities or women are underrepresented and warns managers they may face consequences, including termination, if they hire outside these groups without providing acceptable justification.
This requirement has sparked accusations of reverse discrimination and a breach of federal law.
Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon stated in a letter to Minnesota officials: “We have reason to believe the Minnesota Department of Human Services is engaging in unlawful action.”
Dhillon cited Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, sex, or national origin.
The Minnesota DHS defended the policy, claiming it is designed to meet affirmative action responsibilities and better reflect the demographics of its client base.
The department also pointed out that justification for non-diversity hires has been required in some form since 1987 under state law.
This investigation comes just weeks after the DOJ sued Minnesota for offering taxpayer-funded in-state college tuition to illegal immigrants.
That legal battle followed another confrontation in April, when Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison sued the Trump administration over the inclusion of biological males in girls’ sports.
Justice Department Opens Investigation into the State of Minnesota for Race- and Sex-Based Hiring Practices
🔗: https://t.co/bafEqqGxgE pic.twitter.com/HQs73pARym
— DOJ Civil Rights Division (@CivilRights) July 10, 2025
Commentary:
It’s about time someone stepped in to challenge the radical hiring agenda of the Walz administration.
For years now, hiring in Minnesota’s government has not been about who is most qualified—it’s been about quotas, skin color, and checking the right diversity boxes.
This policy essentially punishes supervisors who hire the most capable person if that person happens to be a white male.
That’s not equality—it’s bigotry wrapped in bureaucratic language.
And the threat of termination for failing to meet these DEI targets is a clear attempt to coerce ideological compliance.
Let’s be honest—if this investigation is thorough, it will almost certainly uncover widespread violations of non-discrimination laws.
These aren’t accidental oversights. They are deliberate policies aimed at re-engineering the workforce based on identity politics.
Minnesota leaders like Tim Walz and Keith Ellison have made a name for themselves by promoting policies that divide, discriminate, and devalue merit.
This is the same state that defends trans athletes in girls’ sports and doles out taxpayer benefits to illegal immigrants—while punishing its own citizens for simply being who they are.
The deeper issue here is the institutionalized contempt for fairness, common sense, and the law.
If you flip the script and asked hiring managers to justify selecting Black or Hispanic candidates, the outrage would be deafening—and rightly so.
But when it’s white applicants being filtered out, suddenly it’s “equity.”
We can only hope this DOJ investigation has teeth. People need to be held accountable—personally.
Not just policy rollbacks, but firings, lawsuits, and court rulings that remind government officials that the Constitution still matters.
It’s also a wake-up call for voters in Minnesota. How much more of this far-left social engineering do you need to see before pulling the plug on these political experiments?
Sadly, given the state’s recent voting history, we’re not holding our breath.
But at least now, the law is paying attention.
The Bottom Line:
The DOJ is investigating Minnesota over a controversial hiring policy that critics say discriminates against white and male candidates.
Officials in the state argue the rule promotes diversity, but federal law bars race- and sex-based hiring criteria.
If the probe confirms the policy violates civil rights laws, legal consequences could follow for both the policy and its enforcers.
Read Next
– Trump Amin Ending Taxpayer Funded Gravy Train For Illegal Aliens In Postsecondary Education
– Federal Aid for Americans Only: HHS Dismantles Backdoor Benefits for Illegals
– Ambassador Who Held Her Head in Disgust During Trump Meeting Just Lost Her Job
– DNC Chair Gives Insane Answer When Asked Why Mamdami Didn’t Condemn Phrase ‘Globalize The Intifada’
– Judge Bypasses SCOTUS Limits, Grants Sweeping Injunction Against Trump Birthright Citizenship Order