The Trump administration is suing California for violating Title IX by allowing biological males to compete in girls’ sports. The legal action comes after a transgender athlete won state girls’ track events, triggering national outrage and a federal investigation.
Key Facts:
- The U.S. Department of Education found California’s education agencies in violation of Title IX.
- Trump officials are seeking an injunction against California’s policy permitting biological males in girls’ sports.
- Transgender athlete AB Hernandez’s wins at state championships sparked nationwide criticism.
- California has 10 days to agree to federal terms or risk losing education funding.
- Governor Gavin Newsom dismissed the lawsuit as political theater.
The Rest of The Story:
The Trump administration, through Education Secretary Linda McMahon, announced legal action against California’s Department of Education (CDE) and the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF).
This action follows a federal investigation that determined the state violated Title IX, which prohibits sex-based discrimination in education.
The investigation came after transgender student-athlete AB Hernandez won multiple girls’ track and field events during the California high school championships.
Critics say these wins deprived biological female athletes of fair competition and recognition.
“The Trump Administration will relentlessly enforce Title IX protections for women and girls,” said McMahon, adding that California has continued “to allow men to steal female athletes’ well-deserved accolades.”
The Department of Education is giving the state 10 days to accept a resolution agreement that would reverse current policies and issue formal apologies to affected female athletes.
The proposed resolution includes steps such as requiring schools to use biology-based definitions of sex, barring males from participating in girls’ sports, and restoring titles and records to impacted female competitors.
It also includes mandatory annual compliance certifications and a federal monitoring plan.
Governor Gavin Newsom’s office responded dismissively, with spokesperson Izzy Gardon calling the move “dramatic, fake, and completely divorced from reality.”
The CIF declined to comment on the legal matter.
California has just REJECTED our resolution agreement to follow federal law and keep men out of women's sports.
Turns out Gov. Newsom’s acknowledgment that “it’s an issue of fairness” was empty political grandstanding.@CAgovernor, you'll be hearing from @AGPamBondi. pic.twitter.com/wa945HtmG6
— Secretary Linda McMahon (@EDSecMcMahon) July 7, 2025
Commentary:
It was only a matter of time before this showdown reached the courts.
California’s policies have openly defied federal law and public opinion.
By allowing biological males to compete in girls’ sports, the state created a system that undermines both fairness and safety for female athletes.
Governor Newsom’s response—mocking the lawsuit as theater—is telling.
He sees this as a chance to rally his political base, even if it means sacrificing girls’ sports.
What he’s missing is how unpopular this stance is with everyday Americans.
Poll after poll shows that roughly 80% of voters oppose allowing transgender athletes to compete against girls.
This isn’t a fringe issue; it’s a clear-cut case of overreach.
The idea that this lawsuit won’t “stick,” as Newsom’s team claims, is wishful thinking.
Federal law is not on California’s side.
Title IX was designed to protect equal opportunity in education—especially athletics—for women and girls.
Allowing biological males into female competition directly contradicts that purpose.
For girls who train hard, only to be displaced on the podium, this is more than political—it’s personal.
The federal government is not trying to punish California; it’s trying to restore the rights of those girls.
Sending apology letters may seem symbolic, but it’s also an admission of failure on the state’s part.
California has already been warned.
If they don’t comply, they risk losing federal funding for their K-12 education system.
That’s not a threat—it’s accountability.
No state, no matter how progressive its agenda, should get a pass for violating the rights of half its student population.
This case will likely end up in court, where the law and public sentiment both lean in one direction.
The state will lose, but not before wasting years and taxpayer dollars fighting a losing battle.
That’s time female athletes won’t get back.
What’s tragic is that common sense could have avoided all this.
But in California, ideology seems to outweigh fairness, biology, and the law.
Thankfully, there are still officials in Washington willing to draw the line.
The Bottom Line:
The Trump administration is taking California to court for violating Title IX by allowing biological males to compete in girls’ sports.
Governor Newsom is brushing it off as political drama, but the law—and public opinion—aren’t on his side.
The outcome could reshape how states handle gender and athletics.
Until then, fairness for female athletes hangs in the balance.
Read Next
– LA Mayor Bass Sues to Stop Immigration Raids as City Spirals Out of Control
– James Brennan, James Comey Under Criminal Investigation For Roles in Russia Hoax
– Obama Judge Lets Trump Pull $800M in Grants—But Blasts Decision as “Shameful”
– Ag Sec Rollins Drops the Hammer on Amnesty For Illegal Aliens: ‘No Amnesty—Period’
