A newly revealed Trump transition plan aims to end U.S. government support for electric vehicles and charging infrastructure, reshaping automotive policy toward domestic battery production and national security.
Key Facts:
– Proposed end to federal subsidies for EVs, including the $7,500 consumer tax credit.
– Suggested global tariffs on battery materials, with exemptions for allies.
– Shift of funds from charging stations to domestic battery minerals and defense priorities.
– Plans to roll back emissions standards to 2019 levels and block California’s stricter rules.
– Tariffs and export restrictions targeting Chinese EV supply-chain components.
The Rest of The Story:
As incoming President Donald Trump’s transition team reviews U.S. auto policy, their proposals call for a sweeping reversal of the current administration’s support for electric vehicles.
Instead of encouraging consumer adoption through federal incentives and a broad charging network, the incoming team wants to focus on domestic supply chains for battery materials.
These moves come as China’s EV industry continues to surge, aided by state support and a strong battery manufacturing base.
The plan would end generous tax credits, reduce environmental regulations on traditional gas vehicles, and impose tariffs designed to boost American mining and production of critical minerals.
By reframing EV-related materials as critical defense supplies, the recommendations direct funds away from charging infrastructure toward bolstering U.S. control over battery components.
Automakers, including those producing EVs, could face fewer emissions rules and find a more favorable environment for selling gas-powered models.
Gavin Newsom is one sore loser.
Now that President-elect Donald Trump is planning to remove the electric car "mandate" and end the $7,500 tax credit for EV buyers, the California governor has plans to offer his own version of the credit.
Buy an EV in California and get your… pic.twitter.com/Qkjo2rbDVd— Mike Netter (@nettermike) December 14, 2024
Commentary:
This proposed pivot should be one of the new Congress and Trump administration’s key priorities.
Rather than relying on subsidies, EV adoption should come from the natural play of market forces.
Consumers should choose electric cars because they make sense—financially, practically, and ethically—not because Washington mandates it.
Encouraging a level playing field, without forcing buyers into EVs, respects the freedom of choice that Americans treasure.
Over time, as technology improves and prices fall, EVs can succeed on their own merits.
Most Americans would welcome this approach, preferring that the government support secure supply chains and national defense while letting the market decide our automotive future.
The Bottom Line:
The proposed policy shift turns away from taxpayer-backed EV incentives and emphasizes economic self-reliance.
READ NEXT: Major Alcoholic Beverage Company Declares Bankruptcy
It’s a course correction favoring free-market choices and national-security interests over subsidized infrastructure.