A federal judge has blocked a key part of President Trump’s border policy that sought to limit asylum claims from migrants crossing the southern border. The ruling could have sweeping implications as the administration moves to appeal.
Key Facts:
- U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss ruled President Trump cannot unilaterally restrict asylum claims from migrants crossing the southern border.
- The ruling challenges a presidential proclamation that declared an “invasion” at the border and aimed to limit asylum rights.
- Moss wrote that neither the Constitution nor immigration law gives the president such sweeping powers.
- The ruling will not take effect for 14 days, allowing time for appeal.
- The White House strongly criticized the decision, saying it contradicts recent Supreme Court guidance.
The Rest of The Story:
Judge Randolph Moss, appointed under President Obama, issued a 128-page ruling stating that the president lacks the unilateral power to block asylum claims from migrants already in the U.S.
The decision targets a Trump administration policy set in motion by a day-one proclamation referring to the southern border situation as an “invasion.”
In his opinion, Moss acknowledged the federal government faces real challenges at the border, but wrote, “nothing in the INA or the Constitution grants the President or his delegees the sweeping authority asserted.”
The ruling applies to a broad group of migrants and temporarily blocks enforcement of the policy.
The White House plans to appeal, arguing the judge’s order conflicts with recent Supreme Court decisions limiting the scope of lower court rulings.
Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller took to X, warning that this could erode national sovereignty, calling the decision an effort to protect illegal immigration under the guise of human rights.
To try to circumvent the Supreme Court ruling on nationwide injunctions a marxist judge has declared that all potential FUTURE illegal aliens on foreign soil (eg a large portion of planet earth) are part of a protected global “class” entitled to admission into the United States. https://t.co/IWWd2nddVC
— Stephen Miller (@StephenM) July 2, 2025
Commentary:
This ruling is a slap in the face to President Trump and the millions of Americans who elected him to restore control at the border.
The Constitution grants the executive branch the authority to manage immigration and defend national sovereignty.
Yet a single district judge is trying to override that authority.
By declaring the President cannot limit asylum claims even in the face of a clear and ongoing illegal immigration crisis, this decision prioritizes the rights of foreign nationals over the will of American voters and the safety of taxpayers.
It’s judicial activism under the mask of compassion.
The Supreme Court has already ruled against nationwide injunctions like this.
Yet this judge attempts an end-run by declaring all future illegal aliens part of a protected class.
It’s an outrageous move that defies both logic and legal precedent.
If the president can’t act decisively in the face of a border invasion, then who can?
The Bottom Line:
A federal judge has moved to block President Trump’s effort to restrict asylum claims, calling the policy unconstitutional.
The White House plans to appeal, insisting the ruling undermines national sovereignty and contradicts Supreme Court precedent.
This case could have major consequences for border policy, presidential authority, and the balance of power between branches of government.
Read Next
– George Bush And Barack Obama Team Up To Slam President Trump
– Assaults on ICE Agents Surge 700% as Criminal Illegal Aliens Grow Bolder
– Air Force And Space Force Smash Recruiting Goals Three Months Early
– DOJ Targets Naturalized Criminals and Terror Threats in Major Citizenship Crackdown
– NYC Dem Mayoral Candidate’s Shocking Plan to Take Over Private Industry
