The Trump administration is restricting classified information sharing with Congress following another intelligence leak—this time concerning U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. The leak has fueled new tensions between the executive branch and both the media and Democratic lawmakers.
Key Facts:
- The administration is limiting classified intel access to Congress after CNN published a leaked DIA report on Iran strike outcomes.
- A senior White House official said the government is declaring a “war on leakers.”
- The report suggested Iran’s nuclear program was only delayed by months, contrary to Trump’s claims.
- National security reporter Natasha Bertrand, who co-wrote the CNN story, also promoted the discredited “Russian disinformation” narrative in 2020.
- Democrats are condemning the intel cutoff, while conservatives call it a necessary security move.
The Rest of The Story:
President Trump’s decision to restrict the flow of classified intelligence stems from a CNN report that quoted a leaked Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) analysis.
The report indicated the January U.S. strikes on Iran’s Fordow and Natanz nuclear sites had limited impact, reportedly setting Iran’s capabilities back only by months.
This directly conflicted with Trump’s claim the regime’s plans were “obliterated.”
The report’s leak drew scrutiny because it was co-written by Natasha Bertrand, who in 2020 also authored a piece amplifying now-debunked claims that the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation.
White House officials now believe the source of the latest leak lies either within Congress or the intelligence community.
“We are declaring a war on leakers,” a senior official told Axios.
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the FBI is investigating, and legal experts say subpoenas could be issued to legacy media outlets that publish leaked materials.
DAVID MARCUS: How jailing deep-state leakers could be good for journalism https://t.co/Jr2Ba0SLg1
— David Marcus (@BlueBoxDave) June 28, 2025
Commentary:
The federal government’s battle with leaks is long overdue.
For years, classified information has made its way into corporate media channels with suspicious timing—always to the detriment of Republican leadership and particularly President Trump.
The media-government pipeline has become less about public interest and more about coordinated political sabotage.
Journalists aren’t acting independently; they’re acting as political operatives, selectively leaking information designed to damage the credibility of an administration they oppose.
The infamous Trump-Russia collusion hoax is a textbook case. Disproven allegations were parroted for years, with Pulitzer Prizes handed out for reports now considered false or misleading.
Yet no accountability followed.
Now, Democrats like Sen. Chuck Schumer and Sen. Mark Warner are rushing to portray the Trump administration’s new intel restrictions as a “cover-up” or “insecurity.”
But the facts point to something else: a national security risk created by politically motivated leaks.
Even after a successful military operation against Iran’s nuclear sites, the leak turned the story from national defense to administration failure.
That wasn’t just spin—it was dangerous. Intelligence leaks can endanger missions, expose assets, and embolden foreign adversaries.
Congress, especially members known for leaking, should not expect unconditional access to classified data.
Trust has to be earned—and it has been repeatedly broken.
Withholding sensitive information from known leakers isn’t “unacceptable”; it’s responsible governance.
It protects national interests and preserves operational integrity.
Until the source of this and previous leaks is found, restricting access is the right move.
The Bottom Line:
President Trump is taking steps to stop intelligence leaks after a damaging report on Iran strikes was leaked to the press.
Critics say it’s a cover-up, but supporters argue the administration must protect national security.
With corporate media aligned with partisan interests and past leaks causing major disruption, the White House’s cautious approach is both justified and necessary.
Read Next
– UN Watchdog Destroys Dem Narrative Regarding Strike on Iran’s Nuclear Program
– Biden Appointed Federal Judge Orders Trump Admin to Release EV Funds to Blue States
