President Trump said former President Obama committed criminal acts in the Russian collusion scandal but may be shielded from prosecution by the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity.
Key Facts:
- Trump said Obama committed “criminal acts” over the Russian collusion hoax but is likely protected by presidential immunity.
- The Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling provides immunity to former presidents for official acts.
- DNI Tulsi Gabbard declassified documents alleging Obama suppressed intel showing Russia didn’t influence the 2016 election.
- The DOJ formed a “strike force” to evaluate evidence revealed by Gabbard.
- Obama’s spokesperson dismissed the allegations as a “weak attempt at distraction.”
The Rest of The Story:
In a bold statement, President Trump accused former President Obama of committing crimes related to the now-disproven claims that Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election.
Trump said the Supreme Court’s ruling in his own case—providing former presidents immunity for official acts—likely applies to Obama as well.
“He’s done criminal acts. There’s no question about it,” Trump said. “But he has immunity, and it probably helps him a lot.”
Trump’s comments come in the wake of new information released by his Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard.
She declassified documents showing the Obama administration allegedly suppressed intelligence assessments that concluded Russia did not intend or have the capability to affect the 2016 election.
Gabbard described it as a “treasonous conspiracy.”
In response to the revived accusations, Obama’s spokesman dismissed the claims as “a weak attempt at distraction.” But Gabbard stood by the documents.
She explained that the original intelligence showed no Russian interference until Obama convened a high-level committee and directed then-DNI James Clapper to create a new narrative.
Trump didn’t hold back, calling Obama the “ringleader” and naming other key figures—including Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, James Comey, and Clapper—as co-conspirators.
“They tried to rig an election, and then they got caught,” Trump declared.
The Department of Justice announced the formation of a “strike force” to examine the declassified material and evaluate potential next steps.
While a direct prosecution of Obama remains unlikely due to the Supreme Court ruling, the new effort could target other officials.
|
Why should Obama be granted Presidential Immunity, when he said, No one is above the law, especially Presidents
Presidential immunity is to protect former Presidents from witch hunts, not those who break the law
I say, Arrest Obama, who's with me 👍
— @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸 (@Chicago1Ray) July 25, 2025
Commentary:
President Trump is right to call out what he sees as one of the greatest political scandals in American history.
The Russia collusion hoax didn’t just damage his presidency—it was a coordinated effort at the highest levels of government to delegitimize an election and a sitting president.
Now, with hard evidence emerging from Gabbard’s disclosures, the truth is no longer speculation.
Obama may very well skate on a legal technicality, shielded by the very Supreme Court decision that protects Trump. But immunity from prosecution doesn’t equal innocence.
The American people deserve to know who lied, who plotted, and who abused power to try to destroy a political opponent.
Obama’s role cannot be downplayed. According to Trump and Gabbard, the original intelligence showed no Russian interference—but Obama allegedly stepped in and directed a new assessment to say otherwise.
If true, this isn’t just spin—it’s a coordinated cover-up. And it reeks of election meddling, ironically committed by those who falsely accused others of it.
The list of alleged conspirators—Clinton, Biden, Clapper, Comey—reads like a who’s who of the Democrat power structure.
These are not minor players. These are the architects of a failed political takedown.
If they knowingly pushed a false narrative, they should face consequences—legal, political, and historical. Trump’s demand for “severe consequences” is justified.
He isn’t just defending himself—he’s defending the presidency from being weaponized.
If Obama and his allies escape all accountability, it sets a precedent that power can be abused without consequence as long as you retire before the truth catches up.
That’s dangerous for any republic. While the courts may shield Obama from jail, they can’t protect him from the court of public opinion.
Trump’s remarks are not just cathartic—they’re a warning. Americans don’t forget betrayal.
Obama’s legacy may be insulated by the media and bureaucracy, but the facts are catching up.
What remains now is whether the DOJ will take real action or bury this scandal like so many others.
Either way, the stain of what happened in 2016 will linger.
The Bottom Line:
President Trump accused Obama of criminal acts in the Russia hoax but admitted the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling likely protects him.
Still, newly declassified documents suggest serious misconduct under Obama’s leadership. The DOJ is now investigating.
Even if Obama avoids prosecution, his role in deceiving the public may haunt him—and his legacy—for decades to come.
Read Next
– Gavin Newsom, California Democrats Plot Illegal Gerrymander To Increase Number of Dem House Seats
– Soros-Funded Groups Throw Support Behind GOP Bill Offering Legal Status to Millions