Trump Says U.S. Bombs Already Solved the Problem of Iran's Nukes But Talks Are Scheduled: Here's Why

The United States may meet with Iran soon to discuss its nuclear program, but President Trump cast doubt on the value of any new agreement after recent U.S. airstrikes reportedly crippled key Iranian nuclear sites.

Key Facts:

President Trump said the U.S. will talk with Iran next week, but downplayed the need for a new nuclear deal.
U.S. airstrikes targeted Iran’s Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow nuclear sites, which Trump claimed were “obliterated.”
The strikes followed a 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran that ended in a ceasefire just two days prior.
The IAEA has not been able to verify the location of Iran’s 60% enriched uranium since before the June 13 Israeli attack.
Iran signaled interest in resuming diplomacy, but its parliament voted to limit cooperation with the IAEA.

The Rest of The Story:

President Trump announced during a NATO summit press conference that the U.S. would meet with Iranian officials next week.

However, he said he didn’t view a new agreement as “necessary,” citing the U.S. bombing campaign’s effectiveness in disabling Iranian nuclear facilities.

“We think everything nuclear is down there,” Trump stated, referencing the Fordow site’s destruction and quoting new intelligence assessments.

The attacks occurred as tensions between Israel and Iran erupted into nearly two weeks of conflict.

Following the ceasefire, focus shifted toward diplomacy.

Iran’s UN mission said, “The logic of war has failed — return to the logic of diplomacy,” though officials have been slow to recommit to nuclear oversight.

The IAEA called for urgent inspections, citing uncertainty around highly enriched uranium that could be used in weapons.

Iran responded with legislation halting cooperation with the watchdog unless its facilities are protected.

Meanwhile, Trump envoy Steve Witkoff had been engaged in talks with Iran before the recent escalation.

Experts note that while Iran’s nuclear infrastructure was hit, it wasn’t entirely neutralized.

“This may tempt Israel or the U.S. to conduct additional strikes,” said Ray Takeyh of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Bill Clinton, George W Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden all talked about denuclearizing Iran.

President Trump did it. The world is a safer place because of his leadership. pic.twitter.com/yy0zI4SC15

— Tiffany Smiley (@TiffanyMSmiley) June 25, 2025

Commentary:

Iran may be signaling it’s ready for talks, but history teaches us to be skeptical.

Every time we think Tehran wants peace, it turns out they’re just buying time.

The regime has built a career on deception — and the stakes here are nuclear.

Yes, the U.S. bunker-busting airstrikes reportedly caused serious damage.

But if we’ve learned anything, it’s that facilities can be rebuilt — and scientists replaced.

Iran’s oil revenue, even under sanctions, gives them enough cash to get back in the game.

The real wildcard? That 60% enriched uranium.

We don’t know where it is.

If Iran moved it before the attacks, it means they were preparing for a worst-case scenario.

That material could be anywhere now — and it’s dangerously close to weapons-grade.

That’s not a setback; that’s a red flag.

This is where the IAEA must step in.

Regular inspections and real access are the bare minimum if we’re going to pretend diplomacy means anything.

Iran’s refusal to cooperate shows they’re not serious — not now, and not as long as the current regime holds power.

Some are eager to sign a new deal, but any agreement built on blind trust would be worse than none at all.

Let’s not forget what got us here in the first place: secret enrichment, defiance, and international bluffing.

Tehran has always played the long game.

A diplomatic reset might help avoid another round of airstrikes, but only if it comes with ironclad verification and consequences.

Without that, the U.S. and its allies will be left reacting to the next “surprise” from Iran’s underground labs.

If Iran wants to be treated like a responsible nation, it needs to act like one.

That starts with transparency and full IAEA cooperation — not blaming the watchdog for its own aggressive behavior.

Until that happens, we should stay cautious.

The regime may be bruised, but it’s not broken.

The clock is still ticking, and we can’t afford to be caught off guard again.

The Bottom Line:

The U.S. plans to meet with Iran, but President Trump doubts a new nuclear deal is necessary given recent military actions.

Iran’s facilities were hit hard, but enriched uranium may have been moved ahead of the attacks, keeping global concerns alive.

With IAEA access restricted and Iran’s trustworthiness in question, diplomacy must be grounded in strict oversight and serious enforcement — not wishful thinking.