President Trump hinted at a bold constitutional move during a cabinet meeting, suggesting he may consider suspending habeas corpus, used by three previous presidents, to bypass activist judges blocking immigration enforcement.
Key Facts:
- President Trump held a cabinet meeting Wednesday to discuss his administration’s accomplishments and challenges.
- A reporter asked whether the president had considered ways to bypass judicial blocks on his immigration policies.
- Trump responded by referencing the constitutional option of suspending habeas corpus, used historically by Lincoln, Grant, and FDR.
- The right to habeas corpus allows detained individuals to challenge their imprisonment in court and is protected under Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution.
- Trump noted he hopes it won’t be necessary, but left the door open if judicial interference continues.
The Rest of The Story:
During Wednesday’s cabinet meeting, President Trump addressed a wide range of issues, including immigration enforcement.
While liberal-leaning reporters asked off-topic or trivial questions, one journalist pressed Trump about the legal obstacles imposed by left-wing judges who continually block deportation efforts.
In response, Trump cited historical precedent for suspending habeas corpus—a drastic but constitutional power granted to the federal government in times of rebellion or invasion, or when public safety is at risk.
The move would allow the government to detain individuals without immediate judicial review.
The National Constitution Center confirms this power has been used sparingly in American history, by Presidents Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War, Ulysses S. Grant during Reconstruction, and Franklin D. Roosevelt during WWII.
Trump emphasized he would prefer not to invoke such a measure but affirmed it remains an available option.
🚨BREAKING: President Trump hints at suspending the Writ of Habeas Corpus to conduct mass deportations🚨
2 days ago I went to the White House Press Briefing and asked if President Trump planned to suspend the writ of habeas corpus to circumvent radical judges blocking his mass… pic.twitter.com/CRVekWa8MD
— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) April 30, 2025
Commentary:
There’s no question the courts are increasingly acting as political roadblocks rather than neutral interpreters of the law.
Activist judges are routinely issuing nationwide injunctions designed to thwart Trump’s ability to carry out the immigration agenda voters elected him to implement.
These injunctions do not just affect one case—they shut down entire policies, creating legal chaos and undermining executive authority.
If the courts continue down this road, they are inviting a constitutional confrontation.
Trump, like Lincoln before him, may have no choice but to act decisively to restore the rule of law and protect national sovereignty.
Suspending habeas corpus is not a decision any president would make lightly, but the situation at the southern border—fueled by judicial obstruction—has reached a crisis point.
It is estimated that up to 20 million illegal aliens may be in the U.S.
If courts won’t allow enforcement of immigration laws and deportation orders, then the system breaks down entirely.
The Constitution provides a remedy for this.
Chief Justice John Roberts, who frequently warns about the Court’s legitimacy, must recognize that rogue judges issuing sweeping injunctions for political purposes are doing more harm to the Court’s standing than anything Trump has said.
SCOTUS should act decisively to limit or prohibit district courts from issuing national injunctions in immigration cases.
If the Supreme Court fails to step in, and if activist judges continue to sabotage national security and immigration enforcement, then President Trump must consider all constitutional tools at his disposal.
History shows that when faced with national emergencies, strong presidents act boldly to protect the Republic.
This moment may demand the same.
The Bottom Line:
President Trump has signaled that continued interference by activist judges may force him to invoke the constitutional power to suspend habeas corpus.
While he hopes it won’t come to that, the flood of illegal immigration and judicial sabotage may leave him little choice.
If the courts won’t allow enforcement of immigration law, then the presidency itself is at risk of being neutered.
It’s time for the judiciary to step back—or risk a historic confrontation.
Read Next
– RFK Scores Major MAHA Victory, PepsiCo Rushes to Make Big Changes to its Products
– Florida Immigration Law Faces Legal Showdown After Federal Judge Rebukes AG’s Defiance
– DC Mayor Bowser Caught With Her Hands In The Cookie Jar, She Has Some Explaining To Do
– A Federal Judge Just Issued an INSANE Order Designed to Block The Border Patrol From Doing Its Job