Tulsi Gabbard Threatens CNN With Massive Lawsuit Over Voter Fraud Smear

Tulsi Gabbard is demanding CNN back down from publishing a story accusing her of voter fraud, warning the network could face a defamation lawsuit if it moves forward.

Key Facts:

  • On April 4, Gabbard’s legal team sent CNN a cease-and-desist letter warning of defamation.
  • CNN reportedly planned to suggest Gabbard committed voter fraud by improperly voting in Hawaii.
  • Gabbard bought a Texas home in 2024 but remains a Hawaii resident and voter, her lawyers say.
  • Texas homestead law allows exemptions for privacy without changing voter residence status.
  • Gabbard’s team accuses CNN of spreading “demonstrably false” claims that could damage her reputation.

The Rest of the Story: Tulsi Gabbard Defends Her Voting Residency

Tulsi Gabbard, currently serving as Director of National Intelligence, may soon take legal action against CNN if the network goes ahead with a report alleging she voted illegally in Hawaii during the 2024 election.

Gabbard’s legal team claims the accusation is baseless and damaging, citing her long-established residency in Hawaii despite purchasing property in Texas.

CNN’s planned report reportedly hinges on Gabbard registering a homestead exemption in Texas.

However, her lawyers argue this exemption was solely to keep her address confidential amid credible threats and does not impact her legal residency.

They note that Gabbard has maintained dual residences in the past while serving in Congress without issue.

Her press secretary emphasized that Gabbard continues to pay taxes and vote as a Hawaii resident.

The legal letter warns CNN that publishing any such claim would constitute defamation per se, since it falsely accuses her of a crime and could cause reputational and professional harm.

Commentary: CNN Keeps Targeting Political Opponents

CNN seems determined to discredit anyone who doesn’t align with its narrative.

Tulsi Gabbard, a longtime public servant and former Democrat, is just the latest example of how the network bends facts to paint political adversaries in the worst possible light.

There’s no evidence Gabbard committed any kind of voter fraud.

Her legal residence remains Hawaii, she continues to vote there, and she has followed state and federal laws.

Declaring a homestead exemption in Texas—under legal guidance—was a matter of personal security, not deception.

Given her high-profile role and the rise in threats from radical political activists, keeping her address private is smart and responsible.

The idea that CNN would turn this into a voter fraud scandal shows a lack of journalistic integrity.

It’s not about informing the public anymore—it’s about shaping a narrative.

Their track record speaks for itself: misleading headlines, selectively edited quotes, and fact-free accusations targeting political opponents.

Gabbard has every right to push back.

If CNN knowingly publishes false claims with intent to harm, she should pursue every legal avenue available.

Defamation laws exist for exactly this reason—when media outlets cross the line from criticism to character assassination.

This also raises broader concerns about media accountability.

If news outlets can smear public officials without consequences, trust in the press will keep declining.

That’s dangerous for a free society.

CNN is on thin ice, and they’ve earned the public skepticism they now face.

The Bottom Line: Tulsi Gabbard Voter Fraud Allegation Could Backfire on CNN

Gabbard has made it clear she will not sit quietly while her name is dragged through the mud.

Her legal team has drawn a firm line, and unless CNN has hard evidence—which has not been presented—they may find themselves in court.

Voter fraud is a serious accusation.

Making it without facts is reckless.

Tulsi Gabbard acted within her rights, and CNN risks further damaging its credibility by pursuing this storyline.

Sign Up For The TFPP Wire Newsletter

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You may opt out at any time.

Read Next

ATF Just Repealed a Controversial Gun Dealer Rule — Here’s What It Means

Another State Set to Approve Over the Counter Ivermectin

Execution by Firing Squad? Idaho’s Brutal New Law for Child Predators

Federal Appeals Court Decides if DOGE Can Access Sensitive Government Data

Trump Reveals His Conditions For a China Trade Deal: Fix This $1 Trillion Problem First